Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2020-2023Duke
Cole Finney
TE • 6'7" • 260 lbs • Hingham, MA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Cole Finney reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
40.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Duke
2021222223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cole Finney, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Duke. Cole Finney reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Duke paired 101 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Duke
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
5.9
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 12. Temple: 32. Pittsburgh: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 1 by 80. Temple: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 1 by 20
Split Comparison
Wins22 · n=2
First Half22 · n=2
All Games15.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202220222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Duke | 101 | 68 | 4.1 | 101 |
| 2022 Postseason | Duke | 47 | 66.7 | 5.9 | -54 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Duke | 47 | 66.7 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | -47 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Duke
101 primary output · 68 efficiency · 4.1 usage
58
#2
2022 Postseason · Duke
40.7
47 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Duke
40.7
47 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8304
Hingham · Hingham, MA
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
148
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.