Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2020-2025Louisiana Tech
Cedric Woods
DB • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Monroe, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cedric Woods shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21 disruption score.
Efficiency
21
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
16.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
202021222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cedric Woods, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Cedric Woods shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Sam Houston
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
21
Usage
3.5
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 0. Unknown: 0. LSU: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Kennesaw State: 0. Western Kentucky: 2. Sam Houston: 3. Delaware: 2. Washington State: 0. Liberty: 1. Missouri State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 3 by 22.5. New Mexico State: 2 by 8.3. Kennesaw State: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 40.8. Sam Houston: 6 by 55. Delaware: 5 by 40.8. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Liberty: 2 by 18.3. Missouri State: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=5 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=5 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Best efficiency game
55 vs Sam Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/30 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 23-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Missouri State | W 42-30 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Liberty | W 34-28 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Washington State | L 3-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Delaware | L 24-25 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Sam Houston | W 55-14 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Tue 10/21 | vs Western Kentucky | L 27-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/9 | @ Kennesaw State | L 7-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs New Mexico State | W 49-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ LSU | L 7-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020202021202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 8 | 20.1 | 4.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 8 | 20.1 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 7 | 16.6 | 1.7 | -1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | -7 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 2 | 12.4 | 7.6 | 2 |
| 2024 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 15.9 | 2 | 3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 5 | 15.9 | 2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 9 | 21 | 3.5 | 4 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 9 | 21 | 3.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#2
Sam Houston
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
21.5
8 primary · 20.1 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
21.5
8 primary · 20.1 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9027
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
150
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 57 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.