Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2021-2025Oklahoma
Clayton Smith
DL • 6'5" • 255 lbs • Queen City, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Clayton Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.8
Consistency
35.3
Season Value
22.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Arizona State
212223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma • Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Clayton Smith, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Arizona State. Clayton Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 11 primary output with 24.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
18.8
Usage
6.4
Consistency
35.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 1. Wyoming: 2. Mississippi State: 1. Texas State: 2. Texas Tech: 0. Kansas: 2.5. Utah: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. UCF: 0. Kansas State: 0. BYU: 0. Arizona: 0. Iowa State: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 26.7. Wyoming: 3 by 32.5. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Texas State: 5 by 40.8. Texas Tech: 0 by 0. Kansas: 3 by 37.5. Utah: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. UCF: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. BYU: 1 by 4.2. Arizona: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 2 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.0 · n=11 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=3 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Texas | L 31-39 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Iowa State | W 45-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Arizona | W 49-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs BYU | W 28-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Kansas State | W 24-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | vs UCF | W 35-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Oklahoma State | W 42-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Utah | W 27-19 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Kansas | W 35-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas Tech | L 22-30 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/12 | @ Texas State | W 31-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Mississippi State | W 30-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Wyoming | W 48-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2021-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona State
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202120222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0.5 | 5.9 | 1.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1 | 15.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona State | 11 | 24.7 | 11.4 | 10 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arizona State | 12.5 | 18.8 | 6.4 | 1.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12.5 | 18.8 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona State | 10.5 | 23 | 7.4 | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.3 takeover score.
#2
Oregon
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.1 takeover score.
#3
Washington State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#4
Iowa State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#5
Kansas
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Arizona State
11 primary output · 24.7 efficiency · 11.4 usage
25.9
#2
2024 Postseason · Arizona State
22.1
12.5 primary · 18.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Arizona State
22.1
12.5 primary · 18.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9812
Texas High · Texarkana, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
81
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.