Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2021-2025Minnesota
Athan Kaliakmanis
QB • 6'3" • 212 lbs • Antioch, IL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Athan Kaliakmanis is a balanced quarterback profile with 21.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
56.4
Consistency
43.9
Season Value
36
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
21222223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Minnesota • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Athan Kaliakmanis, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Rutgers. Athan Kaliakmanis is a balanced quarterback profile with 21.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 3,098 primary output with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Minnesota, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with 333 yards of offense and 69.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Minnesota
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
108.6
Efficiency
56.4
Usage
8.8
Consistency
43.9
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 69. New Mexico State: 0. Unknown: 68. Colorado: 10. Illinois: 11. Penn State: 220. Nebraska: 164. Northwestern: 92. Iowa: 119. Wisconsin: 333
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 11 by 63. New Mexico State: 1 by 33.3. Unknown: 4 by 77.5. Colorado: 5 by 31.3. Illinois: 8 by 14.2. Penn State: 29 by 63.3. Nebraska: 15 by 83.8. Northwestern: 17 by 66.2. Iowa: 19 by 62.1. Wisconsin: 36 by 69.3
Split Comparison
Wins111.3 · n=6 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses116.7 · n=3 · +5.3 vs Wins
First Half31.6 · n=5 · -154 vs Second Half
Second Half185.6 · n=5 · +154 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
83.8 vs Nebraska
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs Syracuse | W 28-20 | 7 | 9 | 80 | 77.8 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 2 | -11 | -5.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Wisconsin300-yard game | W 23-16 | 19 | 29 | 319 | 65.5 | 2 | 0 | 69.3 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Iowa | L 10-13 | 7 | 15 | 87 | 46.7 | 0 | 1 | 62.1 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern | W 31-3 | 7 | 13 | 64 | 53.8 | 0 | 0 | 66.2 | 4 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Nebraska | W 20-13 | 6 | 12 | 137 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 83.8 | 3 | 27 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Penn State | L 17-45 | 9 | 22 | 175 | 40.9 | 1 | 1 | 63.3 | 7 | 45 | 6.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Illinois | L 14-26 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 33.3 | 0 | 2 | 14.2 | 2 | -6 | -3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado | W 49-7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.3 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | 67 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 77.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Minnesota | 1,086 | 56.4 | 8.8 | 1,086 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1,086 | 56.4 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Minnesota | 1,932 | 53 | 16.8 | 846 |
| 2024 Postseason | Rutgers | 2,947 | 60.1 | 19.9 | 1,015 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Rutgers | 2,947 | 60.1 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rutgers | 3,098 | 57.6 | 21.8 | 151 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with 230 yards of offense and 75.6 efficiency.
230
Primary metric
230 total offense with 75.6 efficiency.
#2
Washington
397
Primary metric
Loss with 397 yards of offense and 57.1 efficiency.
397 total offense with 57.1 efficiency.
#3
UCLA
310
Primary metric
Loss with 310 yards of offense and 63 efficiency.
310 total offense with 63 efficiency.
#4
Wisconsin
333
Primary metric
Win with 333 yards of offense and 69.3 efficiency.
333 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#5
Virginia Tech
285
Primary metric
Win with 285 yards of offense and 67.1 efficiency.
285 total offense with 67.1 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
3,098 primary output · 57.6 efficiency · 21.8 usage
65.1
#2
2024 Postseason · Rutgers
63.9
2,947 primary · 60.1 efficiency · 19.9 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Rutgers
63.9
2,947 primary · 60.1 efficiency · 19.9 usage
Milestones
14
250+ passing yards
8
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
22
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8964
Antioch Community · Antioch, IL
- Committed To
- Minnesota
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
9,063
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.