Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2020-2024Louisiana Tech
Tyler Grubbs
LB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tyler Grubbs shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
46.3
Consistency
39.5
Season Value
28.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
2020212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech • Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Grubbs, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Tyler Grubbs shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 6 primary output with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisiana Tech, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
46.3
Usage
13
Consistency
39.5
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 2. Unknown: 1. SMU: 0. North Texas: 0. NC State: 0. UTEP: 3. UTSA: 1. Old Dominion: 1. UAB: 1. Charlotte: 3.5. Southern Miss: 3. Rice: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 6 by 45. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. SMU: 13 by 50. North Texas: 7 by 29.2. NC State: 5 by 20.8. UTEP: 9 by 67.5. UTSA: 8 by 43.3. Old Dominion: 11 by 55.8. UAB: 5 by 30.8. Charlotte: 6 by 60. Southern Miss: 13 by 80. Rice: 6 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins1.8 · n=2 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=9 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
80 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Rice | L 31-35 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Southern Miss10+ tackles · Splash game | L 19-35 | 13 | 7 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Charlotte | W 42-32 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UAB | L 38-52 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Old Dominion10+ tackles | L 20-23 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs UTSA | L 16-45 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/17 | @ UTEPSplash game | L 3-19 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ NC State | L 27-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs North Texas | W 24-17 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs SMU10+ tackles | L 37-39 | 13 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Mississippi State | L 34-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Tulane
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20202020202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 51.3 | 15.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 13 | 51.3 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 16 | 46.3 | 13 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 6 | 50.3 | 17.9 | -10 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tulane | 11.5 | 33.2 | 9.8 | 5.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 11.5 | 33.2 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Tulane | 10 | 26.8 | 8.9 | -1.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulane | 10 | 26.8 | 8.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.8 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
6 primary output · 50.3 efficiency · 17.9 usage
37
#2
2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
36
13 primary · 51.3 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
36
13 primary · 51.3 efficiency · 15.8 usage
Milestones
7
Impact games
6
Splash games
12
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8211
Holy Cross · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
393
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.