Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas A&M
Eli Stowers
TE • 6'4" • 235 lbs • Corinth, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Eli Stowers reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.6
Consistency
50.9
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • New Mexico State • Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eli Stowers, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Vanderbilt. Eli Stowers reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 765 primary output with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, New Mexico State, Vanderbilt.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
49.1
Efficiency
76.6
Usage
27.8
Consistency
50.9
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 55. Virginia Tech: 46. Unknown: 7. Georgia State: 110. Missouri: 57. Alabama: 113. Kentucky: 0. Ball State: 130. Texas: 33. Auburn: 20. South Carolina: 41. LSU: 11. Tennessee: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 4 by 91.7. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 46.7. Georgia State: 9 by 81.5. Missouri: 7 by 54.3. Alabama: 6 by 100. Ball State: 8 by 100. Texas: 3 by 73.3. Auburn: 2 by 66.7. South Carolina: 4 by 68.3. LSU: 2 by 36.7. Tennessee: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.7 · n=6 · +16.2 vs Losses
Losses44.5 · n=6 · -16.2 vs Wins
First Half55.4 · n=7 · +13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half41.7 · n=6 · -13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Georgia Tech | W 35-27 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Tennessee | L 23-36 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ LSU | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 11 | 4 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs South Carolina | L 7-28 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Auburn | W 17-7 | — | 2 | 20 | 5.3 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Texas | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 33 | 7.8 | 11 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 8 | 130 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Kentucky | W 20-13 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Alabama100 receiving yards | W 40-35 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Missouri | L 27-30 | — | 7 | 57 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Georgia State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 32-36 | — | 9 | 110 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Virginia Tech | W 34-27 | — | 2 | 46 | 15.3 | 23 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2022
Opening stop
- 2
New Mexico State
2023
Peak year stop
- 3
Vanderbilt
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | New Mexico State | 366 | 63.3 | 24.9 | 366 |
| 2023 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 366 | 63.3 | 24.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 638 | 76.6 | 27.8 | 272 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 638 | 76.6 | 27.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 765 | 77.3 | 24.4 | 127 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
765 primary output · 77.3 efficiency · 24.4 usage
65
#2
2024 Postseason · Vanderbilt
59.5
638 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 27.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
59.5
638 primary · 76.6 efficiency · 27.8 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9267
Guyer · Denton, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,769
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.