Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2020-2023Michigan
Roman Wilson
WR • 6'0" • 192 lbs • Honolulu, HI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Roman Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
69.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Michigan
20212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Roman Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Michigan. Roman Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Michigan paired 789 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Michigan
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
56.4
Efficiency
92
Usage
19.5
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 54. Alabama: 73. East Carolina: 78. UNLV: 89. Bowling Green: 42. Rutgers: 59. Nebraska: 58. Minnesota: 56. Indiana: 14. Michigan State: 50. Purdue: 143. Maryland: 23. Ohio State: 36. Iowa: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 3 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 100. East Carolina: 6 by 86.7. UNLV: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 3 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 96.7. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Indiana: 3 by 31.1. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 80. Iowa: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins56.4 · n=14
First Half64.7 · n=7 · +16.7 vs Second Half
Second Half48 · n=7 · -16.7 vs First Half
All Games56.4 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/9 | vs Washington | W 34-13 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 37 |
| Mon 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 27-20 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sun 12/3 | @ Iowa | W 26-0 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Ohio State | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Maryland | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-13 | — | 9 | 143 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Michigan State | W 49-0 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Indiana | W 52-7 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Minnesota | W 52-10 | — | 3 | 56 | 16.5 | 18.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Nebraska2+ TD | W 45-7 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Rutgers | W 31-7 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Bowling Green | W 31-6 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UNLV2+ TD | W 35-7 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs East Carolina2+ TD | W 30-3 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 3 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 122 | 77 | 10.6 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 420 | 76.8 | 13.3 | 298 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 420 | 76.8 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Michigan | 376 | 65.9 | 12.9 | -44 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 376 | 65.9 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 789 | 92 | 19.5 | 413 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 789 | 92 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
TCU
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Michigan
789 primary output · 92 efficiency · 19.5 usage
69.9
#2
2023 Regular Season · Michigan
69.9
789 primary · 92 efficiency · 19.5 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Michigan
52.3
420 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 13.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8967
St. Louis · Honolulu, HI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,707
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.