Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2021-2025Cincinnati
Chamon Metayer
TE • 6'4" • 255 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chamon Metayer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.3
Consistency
57
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Arizona State
212223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Cincinnati • Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chamon Metayer, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Arizona State. Chamon Metayer reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 375 primary output with 60.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Cincinnati, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
21.9
Efficiency
59.3
Usage
13.1
Consistency
57
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 16. Wyoming: 32. Mississippi State: 1. Texas State: 57. Texas Tech: 22. Kansas: 20. Utah: 8. Cincinnati: 6. Oklahoma State: 53. UCF: 10. Kansas State: 19. BYU: 24. Arizona: 33. Iowa State: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 3 by 35.6. Wyoming: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 6.7. Texas State: 5 by 76. Texas Tech: 3 by 48.9. Kansas: 1 by 100. Utah: 1 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 40. Oklahoma State: 5 by 70.7. UCF: 3 by 22.2. Kansas State: 2 by 63.3. BYU: 2 by 80. Arizona: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins23.8 · n=11 · +9.2 vs Losses
Losses14.7 · n=3 · -9.2 vs Wins
First Half22.3 · n=7 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half21.4 · n=7 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Texas | L 31-39 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Iowa State | W 45-19 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Arizona | W 49-7 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs BYU | W 28-23 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Kansas State | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs UCF | W 35-31 | — | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Oklahoma State | W 42-21 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-24 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Utah | W 27-19 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Kansas | W 35-31 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas Tech | L 22-30 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 9/12 | @ Texas State | W 31-28 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Mississippi State | W 30-23 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Wyoming | W 48-7 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona State
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202120222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 32 | 100 | 4.8 | 32 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 258 | 60.9 | 15.7 | 226 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arizona State | 306 | 59.3 | 13.1 | 48 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona State | 306 | 59.3 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona State | 375 | 60.2 | 21 | 69 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#2
BYU
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
32
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Arizona State
375 primary output · 60.2 efficiency · 21 usage
60.2
#2
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
53.3
32 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Arizona State
52.4
306 primary · 59.3 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8933
North Miami · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
971
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.