Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2020-2024Oklahoma State
Brennan Presley
WR • 5'8" • 175 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Brennan Presley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
55.5
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma State
202021212222232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brennan Presley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Brennan Presley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 813 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.6
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
20
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 137. Unknown: 68. Tulsa: 35. Boise State: 22. Kansas State: 53. Baylor: 10. Texas: 30. Iowa State: 84. Kansas: 6. West Virginia: 53. TCU: 61. Oklahoma: 40. Baylor: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 10 by 91.3. Unknown: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 58.3. Boise State: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 2 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 66.7. Texas: 3 by 66.7. Iowa State: 6 by 93.3. Kansas: 2 by 20. West Virginia: 6 by 58.9. TCU: 6 by 67.8. Oklahoma: 3 by 88.9. Baylor: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins44.7 · n=10 · -7.3 vs Losses
Losses52 · n=2 · +7.3 vs Wins
First Half50.7 · n=7 · +6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half44 · n=6 · -6.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-35 | — | 10 | 137 | 12.9 | 13.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Baylor | L 16-21 | — | 2 | 20 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oklahoma | W 37-33 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs TCU | W 63-17 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ West Virginia | W 24-3 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Kansas | W 55-3 | — | 2 | 6 | 6.7 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Iowa State2+ TD | L 21-24 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 42 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Texas | W 32-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 11.8 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Baylor | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Kansas State | W 31-20 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Boise State | W 21-20 | — | 1 | 22 | 9 | 22 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Tulsa | W 28-23 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020202021202120222022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 125 | 73.4 | 14.5 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 125 | 73.4 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 619 | 75.3 | 20 | 494 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 619 | 75.3 | 20 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 813 | 77.9 | 23.5 | 194 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 813 | 77.9 | 23.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 988 | 61.1 | 27.5 | 175 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 988 | 61.1 | 27.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 764 | 58.3 | 33.7 | -224 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189
Primary metric
189 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#2
Baylor
183
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
183 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#3
Miami
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 87.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Oklahoma State
813 primary output · 77.9 efficiency · 23.5 usage
66.9
#2
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
66.9
813 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 23.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
60.6
988 primary · 61.1 efficiency · 27.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9148
Rutherford B. Hayes · Delaware, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
3,309
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 58 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.