Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2021-2024Oklahoma
Billy Bowman Jr.
DB • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Denton, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Billy Bowman Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
25.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
212222232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Billy Bowman Jr., DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma. Billy Bowman Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 11.5 primary output with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
5.2
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 2. UTEP: 2. Kent State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Kansas State: 2. TCU: 0. Iowa State: 0. Baylor: 1. West Virginia: 1. Oklahoma State: 2. Texas Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 0 by 20. UTEP: 9 by 57.5. Kent State: 11 by 45.8. Nebraska: 4 by 16.7. Kansas State: 9 by 57.5. TCU: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 2 by 18.3. West Virginia: 7 by 39.2. Oklahoma State: 5 by 40.8. Texas Tech: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half1 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Florida State | L 32-35 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Texas Tech | L 48-51 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Oklahoma State | W 28-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ West Virginia | L 20-23 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Baylor | L 35-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Iowa State | W 27-13 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU | L 24-55 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Kansas State | L 34-41 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Nebraska | W 49-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Kent State10+ tackles | W 33-3 | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UTEP | W 45-13 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120222022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 3 | 16.2 | 3.6 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma | 10 | 30.3 | 5.2 | 7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 10 | 30.3 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 11.5 | 33.2 | 11.1 | 1.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 11.5 | 33.2 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 7.5 | 25.3 | 5.3 | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
BYU
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#2
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.2 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
#5
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
11.5 primary output · 33.2 efficiency · 11.1 usage
33.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma
33.7
11.5 primary · 33.2 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Oklahoma
25.7
10 primary · 30.3 efficiency · 5.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9799
Ryan · Denton, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
191
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.