Usage Score
23
Player Dossier
2020-2025Boise State
Latrell Caples
WR • 6'0" • 191 lbs • Lancaster, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Latrell Caples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.8
Consistency
61.4
Season Value
63
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Boise State
202122222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Latrell Caples, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Boise State. Latrell Caples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Boise State paired 616 primary output with 78.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Boise State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
39.3
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
23
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 87. Oregon State: 23. New Mexico: 22. Unknown: 48. UTEP: 32. San Diego State: 7. Fresno State: 39. Air Force: 40. Colorado State: 17. BYU: 81. Nevada: 13. Wyoming: 39. Utah State: 78. Fresno State: 24
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 6 by 96.7. Oregon State: 4 by 38.3. New Mexico: 2 by 73.3. Unknown: 4 by 80. UTEP: 4 by 53.3. San Diego State: 1 by 46.7. Fresno State: 3 by 86.7. Air Force: 4 by 66.7. Colorado State: 4 by 28.3. BYU: 5 by 100. Nevada: 1 by 86.7. Wyoming: 5 by 52. Utah State: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 4 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins38 · n=9 · -2 vs Losses
Losses40 · n=4 · +2 vs Wins
First Half36.9 · n=7 · -4.9 vs Second Half
Second Half41.7 · n=7 · +4.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/18 | vs North Texas | W 35-32 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Fresno State | L 16-28 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Utah State | W 42-23 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wyoming | W 20-17 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Nevada | W 41-3 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BYU | L 28-31 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Colorado State | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Air Force | W 19-14 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Fresno State | W 40-20 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs San Diego State | W 35-13 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ UTEP | L 10-27 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 48 | 9.8 | 12 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ New Mexico2+ TD | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Oregon State | L 17-34 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.6 | 5.80 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Boise State | 56 | 91.1 | 6 | 56 |
| 2022 Postseason | Boise State | 550 | 67.8 | 23 | 494 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boise State | 550 | 67.8 | 23 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | -550 |
| 2024 Postseason | Boise State | 473 | 74.8 | 17.3 | 473 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Boise State | 473 | 74.8 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Boise State | 616 | 78.7 | 21 | 143 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Boise State | 616 | 78.7 | 21 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah State
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Boise State
616 primary output · 78.7 efficiency · 21 usage
67.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Boise State
67.2
616 primary · 78.7 efficiency · 21 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Boise State
63
550 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8719
Lancaster · Lancaster, TX
- Committed To
- Boise State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,695
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.