Usage Score
21
Player Dossier
2020-2025Boise State
Latrell Caples
WR • 6'0" • 191 lbs • Lancaster, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Latrell Caples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.7
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Boise State
202122222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Latrell Caples, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Boise State. Latrell Caples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Boise State paired 616 primary output with 78.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Boise State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.4
Efficiency
78.7
Usage
21
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 70. South Florida: 58. Unknown: 11. Air Force: 87. App State: 84. Notre Dame: 52. UNLV: 7. Nevada: 35. Fresno State: 16. San Diego State: 42. Colorado State: 70. Utah State: 52. UNLV: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 5 by 93.3. South Florida: 4 by 96.7. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. Air Force: 5 by 100. App State: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 57.8. UNLV: 1 by 46.7. Nevada: 3 by 77.8. Fresno State: 1 by 100. San Diego State: 7 by 40. Colorado State: 7 by 66.7. Utah State: 3 by 100. UNLV: 3 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Wins52.4 · n=7 · +4.8 vs Losses
Losses47.6 · n=5 · -4.8 vs Wins
First Half52.7 · n=7 · +11.5 vs Second Half
Second Half41.2 · n=6 · -11.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/14 | @ Washington | L 10-38 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs UNLV | W 38-21 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Utah State | W 25-24 | — | 3 | 52 | 12 | 17.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Colorado State | W 49-21 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ San Diego State | L 7-17 | — | 7 | 42 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Fresno State | L 7-30 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Nevada | W 24-3 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs UNLV | W 56-31 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Notre Dame | L 7-28 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs App State2+ TD | W 47-14 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Air Force | W 49-37 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 8/28 | @ South Florida | L 7-34 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boise State
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Boise State | 56 | 91.1 | 6 | 56 |
| 2022 Postseason | Boise State | 550 | 67.8 | 23 | 494 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boise State | 550 | 67.8 | 23 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boise State | 0 | — | — | -550 |
| 2024 Postseason | Boise State | 473 | 74.8 | 17.3 | 473 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Boise State | 473 | 74.8 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Boise State | 616 | 78.7 | 21 | 143 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Boise State | 616 | 78.7 | 21 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah State
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Boise State
616 primary output · 78.7 efficiency · 21 usage
67.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Boise State
67.2
616 primary · 78.7 efficiency · 21 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Boise State
63
550 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8719
Lancaster · Lancaster, TX
- Committed To
- Boise State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,695
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.