Usage Score
20.2
Player Dossier
2020-2023Washington
Jalen McMillan
WR • 6'1" • 192 lbs • Fresno, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jalen McMillan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
34.3
Season Value
41.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Washington
202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen McMillan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Washington. Jalen McMillan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Washington paired 1,098 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Washington
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
47
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
20.2
Consistency
34.3
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 175. California: 28. Oregon State: 18. UCLA: 49. Arizona: 38. Stanford: 84. Oregon: 22. Arizona State: 8. Colorado: 17. Washington State: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 10 by 100. California: 3 by 62.2. Oregon State: 2 by 60. UCLA: 4 by 81.7. Arizona: 2 by 100. Stanford: 6 by 93.3. Oregon: 4 by 36.7. Arizona State: 2 by 26.7. Colorado: 3 by 37.8. Washington State: 3 by 68.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins81.3 · Games = 4 · +57.1 vs Losses
Losses24.2 · Games = 6 · -57.1 vs Wins
First Half61.6 · Games = 5 · +29.2 vs Second Half
Second Half32.4 · Games = 5 · -29.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Washington State | L 13-40 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Colorado | L 17-20 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Arizona State | L 30-35 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Oregon | L 16-26 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/31 | @ Stanford | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Arizona | W 21-16 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs UCLA | L 17-24 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ Oregon State | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs California | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-3 | — | 10 | 175 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 39 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington | 16 | 100 | 6.7 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington | 470 | 66.7 | 20.2 | 454 |
| 2022 Postseason | Washington | 1,098 | 81.5 | 21.8 | 628 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Washington | 1,098 | 81.5 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Washington | 559 | 75 | 23.5 | -539 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington | 559 | 75 | 23.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175
Primary metric
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 97 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
150
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Washington
1,098 primary output · 81.5 efficiency · 21.8 usage
69
#2
2022 Regular Season · Washington
69
1,098 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Washington
55.3
559 primary · 75 efficiency · 23.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9701
San Joaquin Memorial · Fresno, CA
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,143
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.