Usage Score
25
Player Dossier
2020-2025Michigan State
Jordon Simmons
RB • 5'11" • 200 lbs • Marietta, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jordon Simmons leans balanced backfield option traits and 47 efficiency.
Efficiency
56.4
Consistency
68.3
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Akron
20212122232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Akron • Georgia State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordon Simmons, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Akron. Jordon Simmons leans balanced backfield option traits and 47 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Akron paired 847 primary output with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Akron, Georgia State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with 160 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Akron
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
77
Efficiency
56.4
Usage
25
Consistency
68.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 27. Rutgers: 109. Unknown: 49. South Carolina: 27. Ohio: 3. Bowling Green: 105. Western Michigan: 160. Eastern Michigan: 110. Buffalo: 79. Northern Illinois: 65. Kent State: 113
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 11 by 12. Rutgers: 9 by 100. Unknown: 9 by 56.7. South Carolina: 8 by 33.9. Ohio: 4 by 7.8. Bowling Green: 14 by 81.3. Western Michigan: 19 by 65.4. Eastern Michigan: 17 by 69.5. Buffalo: 15 by 52.3. Northern Illinois: 14 by 48.5. Kent State: 11 by 92.8
Split Comparison
Wins111.5 · n=2 · +39.6 vs Losses
Losses71.9 · n=8 · -39.6 vs Wins
First Half53.3 · n=6 · -52.1 vs Second Half
Second Half105.4 · n=5 · +52.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/20 | @ Kent State100 rush yards | W 38-17 | 11 | 113 | 10.30 | 0 | — | — | 10.3 |
| Thu 11/14 | @ Northern Illinois | L 16-29 | 12 | 56 | 4.70 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Buffalo | L 30-41 | 14 | 68 | 4.90 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Eastern Michigan100 rush yards | W 25-21 | 16 | 109 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.5 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Michigan150 scrimmage yards | L 24-34 | 13 | 63 | 4.80 | 1 | 6 | 97 | 8.4 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Bowling Green | L 20-27 | 9 | 73 | 8.10 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 7.5 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Ohio | L 10-30 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | — | — | 0.8 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ South Carolina | L 7-50 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 49 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Rutgers100 rush yards | L 17-49 | 9 | 109 | 12.10 | 1 | — | — | 12.1 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Ohio State | L 6-52 | 7 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 2.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Akron
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Georgia State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120212022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan State | 253 | 40.5 | 22.8 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan State | 307 | 35.8 | 12.6 | 54 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan State | 307 | 35.8 | 12.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan State | 9 | 23.5 | 1.7 | -298 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | 17.6 | 3.9 | 5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Akron | 847 | 56.4 | 25 | 833 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia State | 735 | 47 | 20.3 | -112 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with 228 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
228
Primary metric
228 scrimmage yards and 41.7 usage.
#2
Unknown
128
Primary metric
Game with 128 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
128 scrimmage yards and 29.3 usage.
#3
Western Michigan
160
Primary metric
Loss with 160 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
160 scrimmage yards and 35.8 usage.
#4
Rutgers
109
Primary metric
Loss with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 22 usage.
#5
Kent State
113
Primary metric
Win with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
113 scrimmage yards and 18.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Akron
847 primary output · 56.4 efficiency · 25 usage
62.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Georgia State
46
735 primary · 47 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Michigan State
41.7
253 primary · 40.5 efficiency · 22.8 usage
Milestones
9
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8022
Palatine · Palatine, IL
- Committed To
- Marshall
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,165
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.