Usage Score
34.9
Player Dossier
2020-2025Oklahoma State
Dominic Richardson
RB • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Dominic Richardson leans workhorse runner traits and 49.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
49.5
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
2020212122232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State • Baylor • Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dominic Richardson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tulsa. Dominic Richardson leans workhorse runner traits and 49.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 1,195 primary output with 49.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma State, Baylor, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
108.6
Efficiency
49.5
Usage
34.9
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 148. New Mexico State: 113. Navy: 63. Oklahoma State: 157. Tulane: 67. Memphis: 68. East Carolina: 62. Temple: 86. Florida Atlantic: 34. Oregon State: 172. Army: 225
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 21 by 73.7. New Mexico State: 23 by 49.5. Navy: 14 by 48.1. Oklahoma State: 34 by 48.7. Tulane: 17 by 37.9. Memphis: 16 by 39.1. East Carolina: 18 by 36. Temple: 21 by 42.7. Florida Atlantic: 11 by 27.5. Oregon State: 28 by 64. Army: 29 by 77.6
Split Comparison
Wins184.7 · n=3 · +114.2 vs Losses
Losses70.4 · n=7 · -114.2 vs Wins
First Half102.7 · n=6 · -13.1 vs Second Half
Second Half115.8 · n=5 · +13.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
77.6 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | @ Army100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 26-25 | 28 | 203 | 7.30 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 7.8 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oregon State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-14 | 27 | 166 | 6.10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6.1 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 21-40 | 9 | 21 | 2.30 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 3.1 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Temple | L 37-38 | 19 | 78 | 4.10 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4.1 |
| Thu 10/16 | @ East Carolina | L 27-41 | 17 | 59 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.4 |
| Sun 10/5 | @ Memphis | L 7-45 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tulane | L 14-31 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 3.9 |
| Fri 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 19-12 | 31 | 146 | 4.70 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 4.6 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Navy | L 23-42 | 13 | 61 | 4.70 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.5 |
| Sun 9/7 | @ New Mexico State | L 14-21 | 20 | 93 | 4.70 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 4.9 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 20 | 142 | 7.10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Baylor
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Tulsa
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20202020202120212022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 235 | 49 | 15.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 235 | 49 | 15.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 427 | 36.3 | 9.9 | 192 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 427 | 36.3 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 763 | 42.1 | 30.7 | 336 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Baylor | 671 | 42.6 | 24 | -92 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Baylor | 128 | 32.9 | 15.2 | -543 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,195 | 49.5 | 34.9 | 1,067 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
225
Primary metric
225 scrimmage yards and 50 usage.
#2
TCU
134
Primary metric
Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
#3
Baylor
169
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#4
Arizona State
175
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
175 scrimmage yards and 47.8 usage.
#5
Utah
92
Primary metric
Loss with 92 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
92 scrimmage yards and 39 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
1,195 primary output · 49.5 efficiency · 34.9 usage
60.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
49.3
763 primary · 42.1 efficiency · 30.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Baylor
47.9
671 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 24 usage
Milestones
10
100+ rush yards
6
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9755
Gainesville · Gainesville, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,419
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.