Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2019-2025Rutgers
Mohamed Toure
LB • 6'2" • 236 lbs • Pleasantville, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Mohamed Toure shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
26
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
25.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rutgers
19202121222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- Rutgers • Miami
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mohamed Toure, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rutgers. Mohamed Toure shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Miami.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
26
Usage
9
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 3. Temple: 1. Syracuse: 2. Unknown: 0.5. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Illinois: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Indiana: 2. Penn State: 1. Maryland: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 6 by 55. Temple: 2 by 18.3. Syracuse: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Ohio State: 2 by 8.3. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Northwestern: 7 by 29.2. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 7 by 39.2. Indiana: 5 by 40.8. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Maryland: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=8 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
55 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Wake Forest | L 10-38 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Maryland | L 16-40 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Penn State | L 0-28 | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Indiana | W 38-3 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Wisconsin | L 3-52 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Illinois | W 20-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-21 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Michigan State | L 13-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio State | L 13-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Michigan | L 13-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Syracuse | W 17-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Temple | W 61-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2019-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Miami
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | 6.3 | 0.9 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 11.5 | 24.3 | 8.7 | 11.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Rutgers | 12.5 | 26 | 9 | 1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rutgers | 12.5 | 26 | 9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -12.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Rutgers | 17 | 42.6 | 18.8 | 17 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Rutgers | 17 | 42.6 | 18.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -17 |
| 2025 Postseason | Miami | 11 | 28.8 | 8.5 | 11 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Miami | 11 | 28.8 | 8.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.6 takeover score.
#2
Miami
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.1 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.9 takeover score.
#4
Florida
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Maryland
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Rutgers
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.7
#2
2023 Postseason · Rutgers
31.2
17 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Rutgers
31.2
17 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
3
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8683
Glenbard West · Glen Ellyn, IL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
249
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 52 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.