Usage Score
23.8
Player Dossier
2019-2024Toledo
Jerjuan Newton
WR • 5'11" • 192 lbs • Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jerjuan Newton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87
Consistency
65.8
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo
192021222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerjuan Newton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo. Jerjuan Newton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,033 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
63.8
Efficiency
87
Usage
23.8
Consistency
65.8
Best Game by takeover score
Liberty
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 42. Unknown: 54. Massachusetts: 106. Ohio State: 42. Central Michigan: 49. Northern Illinois: 89. Kent State: 125. Buffalo: 54. Eastern Michigan: 35. Ball State: 94. Bowling Green: 54. Western Michigan: 9. Ohio: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 5 by 56. Unknown: 4 by 90. Massachusetts: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 5 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 100. Buffalo: 6 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100. Ball State: 7 by 89.5. Bowling Green: 4 by 90. Western Michigan: 1 by 60. Ohio: 6 by 85.6
Split Comparison
Wins77.1 · n=8 · +37.4 vs Losses
Losses39.8 · n=4 · -37.4 vs Wins
First Half72.4 · n=7 · +18.6 vs Second Half
Second Half53.8 · n=6 · -18.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/21 | vs Liberty | W 21-19 | — | 5 | 42 | 6.8 | 8.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Ohio | W 17-7 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 14-20 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/16 | vs Bowling Green | L 35-42 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Ball State | W 28-21 | — | 7 | 94 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Buffalo | L 27-34 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-31 | — | 5 | 125 | 25 | 25 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 52-32 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 2 | 43 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Central Michigan | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ohio State | L 21-77 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 55-10 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 39 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 21 | 100 | 6.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 203 | 79.5 | 11.5 | 182 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 144 | 69 | 10 | -59 |
| 2022 Postseason | Toledo | 830 | 87 | 23.8 | 686 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 830 | 87 | 23.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 696 | 84.4 | 22.4 | -134 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 696 | 84.4 | 22.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Toledo | 1,033 | 82.1 | 25.2 | 337 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,033 | 82.1 | 25.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
164
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
159
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Toledo
1,033 primary output · 82.1 efficiency · 25.2 usage
66.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · Toledo
66.7
1,033 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Toledo
65.7
830 primary · 87 efficiency · 23.8 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8714
Perry Hall · Nottingham, MD
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,927
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.