Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2019-2021UTSA
RB • 5'9" • 200 lbs • Converse, TX, USA
Sincere McCormick leans workhorse runner traits and 55.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
86
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
83
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
84
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Sincere McCormick built his college career from 2019 through 2021 as a running back from Converse, TX wearing No. 23, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Sincere McCormick's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storySincere McCormick, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA. Sincere McCormick leans workhorse runner traits and 55.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 1,190 | 996 | 194 | 9 | 72 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 11 | 131 | 122 | 9 | 0 | 83.2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 1,467 | 1,345 | 122 | 11 | 83.2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 13 | 1,663 | 1,479 | 184 | 15 | 81.9 |
Related Context
Sincere McCormick played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sincere McCormick recorded 3,942 rushing yards, 509 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
UTSA paired 1,598 primary output with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
99.2
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
30.5
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Incarnate Word: 92. Baylor: 87. Army: 53. North Texas: 63. UTEP: 196. UAB: 49. Rice: 133. Texas A&M: 86. Old Dominion: 148. Southern Miss: 68. Florida Atlantic: 84. Louisiana Tech: 131
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Incarnate Word: 17 by 61.1. Baylor: 12 by 75.5. Army: 8 by 61.4. North Texas: 17 by 39.7. UTEP: 23 by 85.5. UAB: 17 by 25.3. Rice: 16 by 76.6. Texas A&M: 14 by 48. Old Dominion: 26 by 60.9. Southern Miss: 18 by 35.6. Florida Atlantic: 13 by 66.5. Louisiana Tech: 21 by 69.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
85.5 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Louisiana Tech100 rush yards | L 27-41 | 17 | 119 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 6.2 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 26-40 | 12 | 76 | 6.30 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Southern Miss | L 17-36 | 17 | 54 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Old Dominion100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 24-23 | 23 | 137 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-45 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 0 | 2 | 43 | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Rice | W 31-27 | 14 | 94 | 6.70 | 1 | 2 | 39 | 8.3 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | L 14-33 | 16 | 34 | 2.10 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 2.9 |
| Sun 10/6 | @ UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 26-16 | 22 | 189 | 8.60 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8.5 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ North Texas | L 3-45 | 16 | 62 | 3.90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Army | L 13-31 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 6.6 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor2+ TD | L 14-63 | 12 | 87 | 7.30 | 2 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Incarnate Word | W 35-7 | 12 | 74 | 6.20 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 5.4 |
Player Story
Sincere McCormick built his college career from 2019 through 2021 as a running back from Converse, TX wearing No. 23, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Sincere McCormick's career was his backfield work: 3,942 rushing yards, 725 carries, 34 rushing touchdowns, and 509 receiving yards across 36 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2021 with UTSA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 509 receiving yards and 2 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 36 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTSA.
The arc is straightforward: Sincere McCormick moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2019-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,190 | 58.8 | 30.5 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 1,598 | 59.1 | 41.8 | 408 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,598 | 59.1 | 41.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,663 | 55.1 | 39.1 | 65 |
#1 Featured game
vs North Texas
Week 13 · W 49-17 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
254
Scrimmage Yards
98 takeover
254 scrimmage yards and 38.1 usage.
#2
@ UTEP
Week 6 · W 26-16 · Conference game
196
Scrimmage Yards
95.2 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
196 scrimmage yards and 42.6 usage.
#3
@ UTEP
Week 10 · W 44-23 · Conference game
189
Scrimmage Yards
87.8 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 36.5 usage.
#4
vs Western Kentucky
Week 14 · W 49-41 · Conference game
239
Scrimmage Yards
87 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
239 scrimmage yards and 52 usage.
#5
@ Texas State
Week 2 · W 51-48
205
Scrimmage Yards
83.6 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
205 scrimmage yards and 41.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Postseason · UTSA
1,598 primary output · 59.1 efficiency · 41.8 usage
83.2
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
83.2
1,598 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 41.8 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
81.9
1,663 primary · 55.1 efficiency · 39.1 usage
18
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.