Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2020-2025Oregon
Kris Hutson
WR • 5'11" • 174 lbs • Compton, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kris Hutson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.9
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
66.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Arizona
20202121222223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- Oregon • Washington State • Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kris Hutson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Arizona. Kris Hutson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Arizona paired 764 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Washington State, Arizona.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Arizona
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
69.5
Efficiency
79.9
Usage
27
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 24. Unknown: 51. Iowa State: 67. Oklahoma State: 38. BYU: 106. Houston: 56. Colorado: 37. Kansas: 34. Cincinnati: 123. Baylor: 133. Arizona State: 95
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 3 by 53.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 6 by 74.4. Oklahoma State: 3 by 84.4. BYU: 9 by 78.5. Houston: 4 by 93.3. Colorado: 5 by 49.3. Kansas: 4 by 56.7. Cincinnati: 8 by 100. Baylor: 9 by 98.5. Arizona State: 7 by 90.5
Split Comparison
Wins76.7 · n=6 · +13.4 vs Losses
Losses63.3 · n=4 · -13.4 vs Wins
First Half57 · n=6 · -27.4 vs Second Half
Second Half84.4 · n=5 · +27.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ SMU | L 19-24 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Arizona State | W 23-7 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-17 | — | 9 | 133 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-24 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Kansas | W 24-20 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Colorado | W 52-17 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Houston | L 28-31 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs BYU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-33 | — | 9 | 106 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Oklahoma State | W 41-13 | — | 3 | 38 | 13.3 | 12.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa State | L 14-39 | — | 6 | 67 | 9.4 | 11.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Washington State
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Arizona
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202020212021202220222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Oregon | 37 | 62.2 | 6.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oregon | 37 | 62.2 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oregon | 419 | 73.5 | 12 | 382 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oregon | 419 | 73.5 | 12 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oregon | 473 | 64.6 | 15.7 | 54 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oregon | 473 | 64.6 | 15.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 8 | 53.3 | 3.6 | -465 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Washington State | 691 | 75.1 | 24.3 | 683 |
| 2025 Postseason | Arizona | 764 | 79.9 | 27 | 73 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona | 764 | 79.9 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 98.5 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
126
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Arizona
764 primary output · 79.9 efficiency · 27 usage
66.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Arizona
66.9
764 primary · 79.9 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Washington State
63.9
691 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 24.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9199
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
3
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
2,392
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 53 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.