Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2020-2025Auburn
Chris Thompson Jr.
LB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Desoto, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Thompson Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.7
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
12.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn
2020212223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Auburn • USC • Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Thompson Jr., LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn. Chris Thompson Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Auburn paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, USC, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
21.7
Usage
5.7
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. North Texas: 0. Army: 0. Temple: 1. UTSA: 0. UAB: 0.5. East Carolina: 0. South Florida: 1. Florida Atlantic: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 6 by 25. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 20.8. North Texas: 1 by 4.2. Army: 2 by 8.3. Temple: 2 by 18.3. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 4 by 21.7. East Carolina: 5 by 20.8. South Florida: 8 by 43.3. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 59.2
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=2 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · n=9 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=5 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Florida AtlanticSplash game | L 16-63 | 7 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ South Florida | L 30-63 | 8 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/15 | vs East Carolina | L 31-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UAB | L 21-59 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UTSA | W 46-45 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Temple | L 10-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Army | L 7-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Texas | L 20-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 23-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Oklahoma State | L 10-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Arkansas State | L 24-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2020
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2021-2023
Peak year stop
- 3
Tulsa
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20202020202120222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Auburn | 0 | 8.3 | 1.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | USC | 1 | 11.2 | 3.3 | 1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | -1 |
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 0 | 7.5 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 7.5 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulsa | 5.5 | 21.7 | 5.7 | 5.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | 14.2 | 8.2 | -4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#2
California
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.7 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.8 takeover score.
#4
South Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.2 takeover score.
#5
Temple
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Auburn
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36.5
#2
2020 Regular Season · Auburn
36.5
0 primary · 8.3 efficiency · 1.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · USC
36.2
0 primary · 7.5 efficiency · 1.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9215
Duncanville · Duncanville, TX
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
74
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.