Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2019-2022TCU
Dee Winters
LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • Brenham, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dee Winters shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33 disruption score.
Efficiency
33
Consistency
35.5
Season Value
27.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · TCU
1920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dee Winters, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · TCU. Dee Winters shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
TCU paired 10 primary output with 34 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · TCU
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
33
Usage
12.5
Consistency
35.5
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 2. Colorado: 4.5. Unknown: 0. SMU: 1. Oklahoma: 4. Kansas: 0. Oklahoma State: 3. Kansas State: 0. West Virginia: 0. Texas Tech: 4.5. Texas: 0. Baylor: 1. Iowa State: 0. Kansas State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 0 by 20. Colorado: 5 by 65.8. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. SMU: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 8 by 73.3. Kansas: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma State: 7 by 59.2. Kansas State: 6 by 25. West Virginia: 4 by 16.7. Texas Tech: 4 by 61.7. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 5 by 30.8. Iowa State: 6 by 25. Kansas State: 1 by 24.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=12
First Half2.1 · n=7 · +1.0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=7 · -1.0 vs First Half
All Games1.6 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Michigan | W 51-45 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Kansas State | L 28-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Iowa State | W 62-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Baylor | W 29-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Texas | W 17-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas Tech2+ sacks · Splash game | W 34-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ West Virginia | W 41-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Kansas State | W 38-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Oklahoma StateSplash game | W 43-40 | 7 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Kansas | W 38-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oklahoma2+ sacks · Splash game | W 55-24 | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ SMU | W 42-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ ColoradoSplash game | W 38-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | TCU | 7.5 | 24 | 8.2 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 13.5 | 40.6 | 10.7 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 10 | 34 | 12.9 | -3.5 |
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 22 | 33 | 12.5 | 12 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 22 | 33 | 12.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.1 takeover score.
#2
Colorado
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.1 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.5 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · TCU
10 primary output · 34 efficiency · 12.9 usage
30.7
#2
2022 Postseason · TCU
27.6
22 primary · 33 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · TCU
27.6
22 primary · 33 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
7
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
225
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.