Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2019-2023USC
Kedon Slovis
QB • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Kedon Slovis is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58
Consistency
81
Season Value
54.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · USC
191920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- USC • Pittsburgh • BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kedon Slovis, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · USC. Kedon Slovis is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
USC paired 3,445 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Pittsburgh, BYU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Win with 256 yards of offense and 75.4 efficiency. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
211.2
Efficiency
58
Usage
7.5
Consistency
81
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 288. Tennessee: 182. Unknown: 196. Georgia Tech: 297. Virginia Tech: 162. Louisville: 152. North Carolina: 226. Syracuse: 166. Virginia: 208. Duke: 190. Miami: 256
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 31 by 66.7. Tennessee: 28 by 52.3. Unknown: 28 by 75.6. Georgia Tech: 48 by 51.3. Virginia Tech: 30 by 47.5. Louisville: 31 by 43.2. North Carolina: 32 by 52.2. Syracuse: 26 by 54. Virginia: 24 by 76.9. Duke: 34 by 42.8. Miami: 28 by 75.4
Split Comparison
Wins211.7 · n=6 · -2.6 vs Losses
Losses214.3 · n=4 · +2.6 vs Wins
First Half212.8 · n=6 · +3.6 vs Second Half
Second Half209.2 · n=5 · -3.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
76.9 vs Virginia
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Miami3+ TD | W 42-16 | 18 | 28 | 256 | 64.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Duke | W 28-26 | 15 | 32 | 190 | 46.9 | 1 | 2 | 42.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Virginia | W 37-7 | 14 | 24 | 208 | 58.3 | 1 | 0 | 76.9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 19-9 | 16 | 23 | 176 | 69.6 | 0 | 1 | 54 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ North Carolina | L 24-42 | 14 | 31 | 236 | 45.2 | 0 | 0 | 52.2 | 1 | -10 | -10 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | 16 | 29 | 158 | 55.2 | 0 | 2 | 43.2 | 2 | -6 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Virginia Tech | W 45-29 | 15 | 28 | 170 | 53.6 | 0 | 1 | 47.5 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Georgia Tech300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 21-26 | 26 | 45 | 305 | 57.8 | 3 | 1 | 51.3 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 20 | 27 | 189 | 74.1 | 0 | 0 | 75.6 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Tennessee | L 27-34 | 14 | 24 | 195 | 58.3 | 1 | 1 | 52.3 | 4 | -13 | -3.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs West Virginia300-yard game | W 38-31 | 16 | 24 | 308 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 66.7 | 7 | -20 | -2.90 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Pittsburgh
2022
Peak year stop
- 3
BYU
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201920192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | USC | 3,445 | 62.2 | 13.7 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | USC | 3,445 | 62.2 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | USC | 1,864 | 57 | 12.8 | -1,581 |
| 2021 Regular Season | USC | 2,117 | 58.1 | 11 | 253 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,323 | 58 | 7.5 | 206 |
| 2023 Regular Season | BYU | 1,675 | 54.2 | 12.9 | -648 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Win with 256 yards of offense and 75.4 efficiency.
256
Primary metric
256 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#2
Colorado
276
Primary metric
Win with 276 yards of offense and 81.6 efficiency.
276 total offense with 81.6 efficiency.
#3
Virginia
208
Primary metric
Win with 208 yards of offense and 76.9 efficiency.
208 total offense with 76.9 efficiency.
#4
UCLA
502
Primary metric
Win with 502 yards of offense and 67.5 efficiency.
502 total offense with 67.5 efficiency.
#5
West Virginia
288
Primary metric
Win with 288 yards of offense and 66.7 efficiency.
288 total offense with 66.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · USC
3,445 primary output · 62.2 efficiency · 13.7 usage
62.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · USC
62.3
3,445 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
54.6
2,323 primary · 58 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
24
250+ passing yards
12
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
11,424
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.