Usage Score
22.9
Player Dossier
2019-2022Bowling Green
Christian Sims
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Norcross, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Christian Sims reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.1
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Sims, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Christian Sims reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
41.8
Efficiency
65.1
Usage
22.9
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 76. Unknown: 50. Minnesota: 51. Kent State: 55. Akron: 15. Northern Illinois: 0. Eastern Michigan: 17. Buffalo: 103. Miami (OH): 21. Ohio: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 8 by 63.3. Unknown: 4 by 83.3. Minnesota: 6 by 56.7. Kent State: 7 by 52.4. Akron: 3 by 33.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100. Buffalo: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 46.7. Ohio: 4 by 50
Split Comparison
Wins61.3 · n=3 · +30.7 vs Losses
Losses30.7 · n=6 · -30.7 vs Wins
First Half49.4 · n=5 · +15.2 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · n=5 · -15.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | vs Ohio | W 21-10 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Miami (OH) | L 7-34 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-44 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 2 | 81 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 24-55 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Northern Illinois | L 26-34 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Akron | L 20-35 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Kent State | L 20-27 | — | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Minnesota | W 14-10 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs South AlabamaHigh volume | L 19-22 | — | 8 | 76 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 51 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 72 | 52.7 | 11.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | -72 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 418 | 65.1 | 22.9 | 418 |
| 2022 Postseason | Bowling Green | 458 | 65.8 | 18.2 | 40 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 458 | 65.8 | 18.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
64.8
458 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
64.8
458 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 18.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7683
Norcross · Norcross, GA
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
948
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.