Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2019-2024Ohio State
Bryson Shaw
S • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Eldersburg, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Bryson Shaw shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 12.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.4
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
12
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ohio State
192021212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Ohio State • USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryson Shaw, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ohio State. Bryson Shaw shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 12.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
22.4
Usage
4
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 0. Minnesota: 0. Oregon: 0. Tulsa: 1. Akron: 0. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 0. Indiana: 0. Penn State: 1. Nebraska: 1. Purdue: 0.5. Michigan State: 0. Michigan: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 9 by 37.5. Minnesota: 3 by 12.5. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Tulsa: 5 by 30.8. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 4 by 16.7. Penn State: 4 by 26.7. Nebraska: 5 by 30.8. Purdue: 8 by 38.3. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Wins0.3 · n=11 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=2 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.1 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
38.3 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Utah | W 48-45 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Michigan | L 27-42 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Michigan State | W 56-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Purdue | W 59-31 | 8 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Nebraska | W 26-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Penn State | W 33-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Indiana | W 54-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Maryland | W 66-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Rutgers | W 52-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Akron | W 59-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Tulsa | W 41-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Oregon | L 28-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Minnesota | W 45-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | 14.2 | 0.6 | 1 |
| 2021 Postseason | Ohio State | 4.5 | 22.4 | 4 | 3.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 4.5 | 22.4 | 4 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 6 | 28.3 | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 3 | 22.4 | 5 | -3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 3 | 22.4 | 5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | USC | 1 | 12.2 | 1.9 | -2 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 1 | 12.2 | 1.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#3
Colorado
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Louisville
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Ohio State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2020 Regular Season · Ohio State
29.2
1 primary · 14.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · USC
14.7
6 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8803
St. Louis · Honolulu, HI
- Committed To
- Nebraska
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
175
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.