Usage Score
29.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Temple
Edward Saydee
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Philadelphia, PA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Edward Saydee leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
39.1
Consistency
42.6
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Temple
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Edward Saydee, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Temple. Edward Saydee leans balanced backfield option traits and 42.2 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Temple paired 901 primary output with 39.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 39.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Temple
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
75.1
Efficiency
39.1
Usage
29.9
Consistency
42.6
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 17. Unknown: 61. Rutgers: 40. Massachusetts: 8. Memphis: 12. UCF: 56. Tulsa: 77. Navy: 117. South Florida: 334. Houston: 79. Cincinnati: 39. East Carolina: 61
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 9 by 20.4. Unknown: 12 by 52.4. Rutgers: 17 by 20.4. Massachusetts: 3 by 27.8. Memphis: 5 by 30.3. UCF: 11 by 49.7. Tulsa: 25 by 34.4. Navy: 20 by 51.6. South Florida: 28 by 99.7. Houston: 23 by 21.7. Cincinnati: 11 by 28. East Carolina: 21 by 32.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins171 · Games = 2 · +115.7 vs Losses
Losses55.3 · Games = 9 · -115.7 vs Wins
First Half32.3 · Games = 6 · -85.5 vs Second Half
Second Half117.8 · Games = 6 · +85.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
99.7 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs East Carolina | L 46-49 | 14 | 45 | 3.20 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 2.9 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Cincinnati | L 3-23 | 9 | 19 | 2.10 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Houston | L 36-43 | 17 | 20 | 1.20 | 1 | 6 | 59 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs South Florida100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 54-28 | 24 | 265 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 69 | 11.9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Navy | L 20-27 | 14 | 61 | 4.40 | 0 | 6 | 56 | 5.8 |
| Fri 10/21 | vs Tulsa | L 16-27 | 20 | 69 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 3.1 |
| Thu 10/13 | @ UCF | L 13-70 | 9 | 41 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Memphis | L 3-24 | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Massachusetts | W 28-0 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Rutgers | L 14-16 | 16 | 27 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 2.4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 55 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5.1 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Duke | L 0-30 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Temple | 2 | 10.4 | 3.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Temple | 67 | 35.6 | 8.3 | 65 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Temple | 465 | 39.8 | 19.6 | 398 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Temple | 901 | 39.1 | 29.9 | 436 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Temple | 394 | 42.2 | 14.2 | -507 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
334
Primary metric
334 scrimmage yards and 49.1 usage.
#2
James Madison
100
Primary metric
Game driven by a workhorse rushing load.
100 scrimmage yards and — usage.
#3
Rutgers
82
Primary metric
Loss with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82 scrimmage yards and 31.8 usage.
#4
South Florida
72
Primary metric
Loss with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 22 usage.
#5
UCF
31
Primary metric
Loss with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
31 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Temple
901 primary output · 39.1 efficiency · 29.9 usage
52.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Temple
42.9
465 primary · 39.8 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Temple
41.8
394 primary · 42.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8119
William Penn Charter · Philadelphia, PA
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,829
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.