Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2019-2023Arizona State
Ricky Pearsall
WR • 6'1" • 192 lbs • Tempe, AZ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ricky Pearsall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
60.5
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Florida
1919202121222223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Arizona State • Florida
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ricky Pearsall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Florida. Ricky Pearsall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Florida paired 970 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona State, Florida.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.6
Efficiency
67
Usage
24.2
Consistency
60.5
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 65. Unknown: 27. UNLV: 38. BYU: 44. Colorado: -2. UCLA: 132. Stanford: 17. Utah: 39. Washington State: 83. USC: 39. Washington: 4. Oregon State: 42. Arizona: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 90. UNLV: 4 by 63.3. BYU: 5 by 58.7. Colorado: 2 by 0. UCLA: 4 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 56.7. Utah: 3 by 86.7. Washington State: 9 by 61.5. USC: 4 by 65. Washington: 1 by 26.7. Oregon State: 3 by 93.3. Arizona: 5 by 69.3
Split Comparison
Wins40 · n=7 · -14.6 vs Losses
Losses54.6 · n=5 · +14.6 vs Wins
First Half45.9 · n=7 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half43.2 · n=6 · -2.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Wisconsin | L 13-20 | — | 4 | 65 | 9.8 | 16.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Arizona2+ TD | W 38-15 | — | 5 | 52 | 9.8 | 10.40 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Oregon State | L 10-24 | — | 3 | 42 | 11.3 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Washington | W 35-30 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs USC | W 31-16 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Washington StateHigh volume | L 21-34 | — | 9 | 83 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ Utah | L 21-35 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Stanford | W 28-10 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ UCLA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-23 | — | 4 | 132 | 33 | 33 | 2 | 65 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Colorado | W 35-13 | — | 2 | -2 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ BYU | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs UNLV | W 37-10 | — | 4 | 38 | 10.4 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 17.7 | 13.50 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Florida
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192019202020212021202220222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Arizona State | 128 | 81.9 | 5.5 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 128 | 81.9 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Arizona State | 86 | 84.4 | 21.1 | -42 |
| 2021 Postseason | Arizona State | 580 | 67 | 24.2 | 494 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arizona State | 580 | 67 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Florida | 661 | 95.2 | 17.9 | 81 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Florida | 661 | 95.2 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida | 970 | 87.7 | 22.5 | 309 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
166
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCLA
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon State
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Florida
970 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 22.5 usage
68.3
#2
2022 Postseason · Florida
56.5
661 primary · 95.2 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Florida
56.5
661 primary · 95.2 efficiency · 17.9 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8631
Buford · Buford, GA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,425
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.