Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2019-2025Michigan State
Tate Hallock
S • 6'4" • 210 lbs • Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tate Hallock shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.2
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
15.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Michigan State
192021222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Western Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tate Hallock, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Michigan State. Tate Hallock shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Western Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
35.2
Usage
9.2
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Syracuse: 0.5. Iowa: 2. Toledo: 4. Ball State: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Ohio: 1. Central Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Bowling Green: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 29.2. Syracuse: 10 by 46.7. Iowa: 8 by 53.3. Toledo: 7 by 69.2. Ball State: 6 by 25. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Miami (OH): 6 by 25. Ohio: 5 by 30.8. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Northern Illinois: 8 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=2 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=8 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=5 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | vs Bowling Green | L 10-34 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-24 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/8 | vs Central Michigan | W 38-28 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ohio | L 17-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Miami (OH) | L 21-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Mississippi State | L 28-41 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Ball State | W 42-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ ToledoSplash game | L 31-49 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Iowa | L 10-41 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Syracuse10+ tackles | L 7-48 | 10 | 8 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Western Michigan
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 16.7 | 2.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 7.5 | 35.2 | 9.2 | 7.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Michigan | 14 | 37.7 | 11.2 | 6.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 14 | 37.7 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Western Michigan | 7.5 | 25.3 | 5.9 | -6.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 7.5 | 25.3 | 5.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.5 takeover score.
#2
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.9 takeover score.
#3
Kent State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#4
Ball State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.9 takeover score.
#5
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 2.7 usage
39.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Western Michigan
29.1
14 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 11.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
231
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.