Usage / Role
75%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2019-2021Texas A&M
RB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Spring, TX, USA
Isaiah Spiller leans workhorse runner traits and 58.7 efficiency.
Usage / Role
75%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
81
High-end production for a back
Reliability
82
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Player Story
Isaiah Spiller built his college career from 2019 through 2021 as a running back from Spring, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Isaiah Spiller's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Isaiah Spiller, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · Texas A&M. Isaiah Spiller leans workhorse runner traits and 58.7 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 13 | 73 | 77 | -4 | 1 | 72.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 13 | 1,076 | 869 | 207 | 9 | 72.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Texas A&M | 10 | 69 | 50 | 19 | 2 | 84 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10 | 1,164 | 990 | 174 | 7 | 84 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12 | 1,200 | 1,011 | 189 | 7 | 81.5 |
Related Context
Isaiah Spiller played RB for Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Isaiah Spiller recorded 2,997 rushing yards, 585 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,233 primary output with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
100
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
32.9
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 137. Colorado: 76. New Mexico: 117. Arkansas: 121. Mississippi State: 100. Alabama: 89. Missouri: 178. South Carolina: 122. Auburn: 115. Ole Miss: 48. Prairie View A&M: 70. LSU: 27
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 19 by 71.6. Colorado: 14 by 38.2. New Mexico: 15 by 81.3. Arkansas: 17 by 79.1. Mississippi State: 16 by 65.1. Alabama: 21 by 34.6. Missouri: 21 by 85.3. South Carolina: 21 by 59.6. Auburn: 22 by 55.1. Ole Miss: 18 by 28.2. Prairie View A&M: 9 by 81. LSU: 11 by 25.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
85.3 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ LSU | L 24-27 | 11 | 27 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Prairie View A&M | W 52-3 | 9 | 70 | 7.80 | 1 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Ole Miss | L 19-29 | 15 | 41 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 2.7 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Auburn100 rush yards | W 20-3 | 21 | 112 | 5.30 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs South Carolina100 rush yards | W 44-14 | 18 | 102 | 5.70 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 5.8 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Missouri100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-14 | 20 | 168 | 8.40 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8.5 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Alabama | W 41-38 | 17 | 46 | 2.70 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards | L 22-26 | 16 | 100 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Arkansas | L 10-20 | 12 | 95 | 7.90 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 7.1 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs New Mexico100 rush yards | W 34-0 | 15 | 117 | 7.80 | 1 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Colorado | W 10-7 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 0 | 6 | 56 | 5.4 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Kent State100 rush yards | W 41-10 | 17 | 113 | 6.60 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 7.2 |
Player Story
Isaiah Spiller built his college career from 2019 through 2021 as a running back from Spring, TX wearing No. 28, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Isaiah Spiller's career was his backfield work: 2,997 rushing yards, 539 carries, 25 rushing touchdowns, and 585 receiving yards across 35 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2019 with Texas A&M. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 585 receiving yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 35 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Texas A&M.
The arc is straightforward: Isaiah Spiller moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2019-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,149 | 50.4 | 28.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,149 | 50.4 | 28.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,233 | 59 | 36.4 | 84 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,233 | 59 | 36.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,200 | 58.7 | 32.9 | -33 |
#1 Featured game
vs UTSA
Week 10 · W 45-14
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
224
Scrimmage Yards
98.1 takeover
224 scrimmage yards and 35 usage.
#2
@ Missouri
Week 7 · W 35-14 · Conference game
178
Scrimmage Yards
95.1 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
178 scrimmage yards and 38.2 usage.
#3
vs Florida
Week 6 · W 41-38 · Conference game
189
Scrimmage Yards
90.1 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 44.3 usage.
#4
@ South Carolina
Week 10 · W 48-3 · Conference game
177
Scrimmage Yards
89.5 takeover
Win with 177 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
177 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#5
@ Arkansas
Week 4 · L 10-20 · Conference game
121
Scrimmage Yards
82.4 takeover
Loss with 121 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
121 scrimmage yards and 39.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,233 primary output · 59 efficiency · 36.4 usage
84
#2
2020 Regular Season · Texas A&M
84
1,233 primary · 59 efficiency · 36.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
81.5
1,200 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 32.9 usage
16
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.