Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2019-2024Bowling Green
Andrew Bench
TE • 6'4" • 251 lbs • Elmore, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Andrew Bench reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
55.8
Consistency
27.6
Season Value
46.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
19202122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Bowling Green • South Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Bench, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Andrew Bench reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, South Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
12.1
Efficiency
55.8
Usage
5.9
Consistency
27.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 6. Unknown: 18. Mississippi State: 31. Akron: 3. Buffalo: 38. Central Michigan: 3. Kent State: 0. Toledo: 3. Ohio: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 40. Unknown: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. Akron: 1 by 20. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 20. Toledo: 1 by 20. Ohio: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins3 · n=3 · -13.4 vs Losses
Losses16.4 · n=5 · +13.4 vs Wins
First Half19.2 · n=5 · +15.9 vs Second Half
Second Half3.3 · n=4 · -15.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/23 | @ Ohio | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Toledo | W 42-35 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Kent State | L 6-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Central Michigan | W 34-18 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Buffalo | L 7-38 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Akron | W 31-28 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Mississippi State | L 14-45 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ UCLA | L 17-45 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2019-2023
Opening stop
- 2
South Alabama
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2019202020212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 48 | 100 | 4.6 | 48 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 109 | 55.8 | 5.9 | 61 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 20 | 50 | 7.4 | -89 |
| 2024 Postseason | South Alabama | 19 | 100 | 5 | -1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | South Alabama | 19 | 100 | 5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38
Primary metric
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Alabama
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
54.6
48 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7644
Genoa Area · Genoa, OH
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
196
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.