Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2019-2024Oklahoma
Theo Wease Jr.
WR • 6'2" • 192 lbs • Allen, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Theo Wease Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.5
Consistency
74.4
Season Value
71.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma
19192020212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- Oklahoma • Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Theo Wease Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma. Theo Wease Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Missouri
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
68
Efficiency
87.5
Usage
24.1
Consistency
74.4
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 75. Unknown: 30. Buffalo: 149. Boston College: 53. Vanderbilt: 55. Texas A&M: 72. Massachusetts: 48. Auburn: 56. Alabama: 19. Oklahoma: 70. South Carolina: 85. Mississippi State: 72. Arkansas: 100
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 5 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 66.7. Buffalo: 13 by 76.4. Boston College: 5 by 70.7. Vanderbilt: 5 by 73.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 93.3. Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Oklahoma: 4 by 100. South Carolina: 6 by 94.4. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins75.3 · n=9 · +16.7 vs Losses
Losses58.7 · n=3 · -16.7 vs Wins
First Half68.9 · n=7 · +1.9 vs Second Half
Second Half67 · n=6 · -1.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/30 | vs Iowa | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 28-21 | — | 4 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 70 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Mississippi State | W 39-20 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ South Carolina | L 30-34 | — | 6 | 85 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Oklahoma2+ TD | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Alabama | L 0-34 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn | W 21-17 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Massachusetts | W 45-3 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-41 | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-27 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Boston College | W 27-21 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-0 | — | 13 | 149 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 39 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Missouri
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2019201920202020202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 131 | 94.7 | 6.2 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 131 | 94.7 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma | 530 | 77.8 | 15 | 399 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 530 | 77.8 | 15 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | -530 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 378 | 83.5 | 12.1 | 378 |
| 2023 Postseason | Missouri | 661 | 75.9 | 19.2 | 283 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Missouri | 661 | 75.9 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Missouri | 884 | 87.5 | 24.1 | 223 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Missouri | 884 | 87.5 | 24.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 76.4 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Vanderbilt
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Missouri
71.5
884 primary · 87.5 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Missouri
71.5
884 primary · 87.5 efficiency · 24.1 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9903
Allen · Allen, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
2,584
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.