Usage Score
36.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Ole Miss
John Rhys Plumlee
QB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
John Rhys Plumlee is a pass-first distributor with 29.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
67.9
Consistency
76.3
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UCF
1920202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ole Miss • UCF
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Rhys Plumlee, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UCF. John Rhys Plumlee is a pass-first distributor with 29.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UCF paired 2,776 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 67.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, UCF.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
214.4
Efficiency
67.9
Usage
36.4
Consistency
76.3
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 135. Alabama: 250. Vanderbilt: 264. Missouri: 246. Texas A&M: 69. Auburn: 178. New Mexico State: 301. LSU: 335. Mississippi State: 152
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 10 by 99.4. Alabama: 53 by 51.7. Vanderbilt: 40 by 69.1. Missouri: 40 by 64.9. Texas A&M: 25 by 46. Auburn: 37 by 61.2. New Mexico State: 29 by 81.4. LSU: 37 by 73.8. Mississippi State: 32 by 63.4
Split Comparison
Wins282.5 · n=2 · +87.5 vs Losses
Losses195 · n=7 · -87.5 vs Wins
First Half192.8 · n=5 · -48.7 vs Second Half
Second Half241.5 · n=4 · +48.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
99.4 vs California
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-21 | 9 | 14 | 121 | 64.3 | 0 | 0 | 63.4 | 18 | 31 | 1.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs LSU3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 37-58 | 9 | 16 | 123 | 56.3 | 0 | 1 | 73.8 | 21 | 212 | 10.10 | 4 | 60 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs New Mexico StateDual-threat | W 41-3 | 11 | 17 | 124 | 64.7 | 0 | 0 | 81.4 | 12 | 177 | 14.80 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ AuburnDual-threat | L 14-20 | 11 | 20 | 86 | 55.0 | 0 | 0 | 61.2 | 17 | 92 | 5.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Texas A&M | L 17-24 | 4 | 12 | 31 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 13 | 38 | 2.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Missouri3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 27-38 | 8 | 17 | 103 | 47.1 | 2 | 0 | 64.9 | 23 | 143 | 6.20 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs VanderbiltDual-threat | W 31-6 | 10 | 18 | 99 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | 69.1 | 22 | 165 | 7.50 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Alabama3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 31-59 | 10 | 28 | 141 | 35.7 | 2 | 1 | 51.7 | 25 | 109 | 4.40 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs CaliforniaDual-threat | L 20-28 | 7 | 7 | 82 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 99.4 | 3 | 53 | 17.70 | 0 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
UCF
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,930 | 67.9 | 36.4 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Ole Miss | 145 | 51 | 9.5 | -1,785 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 145 | 51 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 78 | 46.9 | 5.4 | -67 |
| 2022 Postseason | UCF | 3,434 | 65.9 | 27.5 | 3,356 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UCF | 3,434 | 65.9 | 27.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UCF | 2,776 | 67.8 | 29.2 | -658 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UCF | 2,776 | 67.8 | 29.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
335
Primary metric
335 total offense with 73.8 efficiency.
#2
Florida Atlantic
460
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
460 total offense with 74.3 efficiency.
#3
Oklahoma State
373
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
373 total offense with 78.5 efficiency.
#4
Vanderbilt
264
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
264 total offense with 69.1 efficiency.
#5
Kent State
371
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
371 total offense with 81.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UCF
2,776 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
66
#2
2023 Regular Season · UCF
66
2,776 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · UCF
64.3
3,434 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 27.5 usage
Milestones
16
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
27
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
8,363
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.