Usage Score
10.5
Player Dossier
2019-2024USC
Kyle Ford
WR • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Corona, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kyle Ford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.8
Consistency
70.5
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · USC
192021222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- USC • UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Ford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · USC. Kyle Ford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
USC paired 317 primary output with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, UCLA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · USC
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
31.7
Efficiency
76.8
Usage
10.5
Consistency
70.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 59. LSU: 45. Utah State: 35. Wisconsin: 24. Minnesota: 17. Maryland: 14. Rutgers: 45. Washington: 9. Nebraska: 28. Notre Dame: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 6 by 65.6. LSU: 2 by 100. Utah State: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 80. Minnesota: 2 by 56.7. Maryland: 2 by 46.7. Rutgers: 4 by 75. Washington: 1 by 60. Nebraska: 2 by 93.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 91.1
Split Comparison
Wins39.3 · n=6 · +19.1 vs Losses
Losses20.3 · n=4 · -19.1 vs Wins
First Half36 · n=5 · +8.6 vs Second Half
Second Half27.4 · n=5 · -8.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-31 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Notre Dame | L 35-49 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Nebraska | W 28-20 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Washington | L 21-26 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Rutgers | W 42-20 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Maryland | L 28-29 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Minnesota | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-21 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Utah State | W 48-0 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ LSU | W 27-20 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2019-2024
Opening stop
- 2
UCLA
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | USC | 20 | 100 | 3.1 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | -20 |
| 2021 Regular Season | USC | 252 | 81.3 | 9.2 | 252 |
| 2022 Postseason | USC | 365 | 82.6 | 8.2 | 113 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 365 | 82.6 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UCLA | 236 | 67.8 | 12.4 | -129 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UCLA | 236 | 67.8 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | USC | 317 | 76.8 | 10.5 | 81 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 317 | 76.8 | 10.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · USC
317 primary output · 76.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
62.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · USC
62.2
317 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · USC
56.5
365 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9812
Orange Lutheran · Orange, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,190
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.