Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2019-2024USC
Bru McCoy
WR • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Palos Verdes Estates, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Bru McCoy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.3
Consistency
57.6
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Tennessee
1920212222232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- USC • Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bru McCoy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Tennessee. Bru McCoy reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Tennessee paired 667 primary output with 73.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
39.3
Efficiency
68.3
Usage
20
Consistency
57.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 40. Unknown: 89. NC State: 10. Kent State: 9. Oklahoma: 92. Arkansas: 9. Florida: 0. Alabama: 80. Kentucky: 56. Mississippi State: 12. Georgia: 38. UTEP: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 4 by 66.7. Unknown: 6 by 98.9. NC State: 1 by 66.7. Kent State: 1 by 60. Oklahoma: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 30. Alabama: 6 by 88.9. Kentucky: 5 by 74.7. Mississippi State: 2 by 40. Georgia: 4 by 63.3. UTEP: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins37 · n=8 · +8 vs Losses
Losses29 · n=3 · -8 vs Wins
First Half41.5 · n=6 · +4.3 vs Second Half
Second Half37.2 · n=6 · -4.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/22 | @ Ohio State | L 17-42 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTEP2+ TD | W 56-0 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Georgia | L 17-31 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Mississippi State | W 33-14 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Kentucky | W 28-18 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Alabama | W 24-17 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida | W 23-17 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Arkansas | L 14-19 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Oklahoma | W 25-15 | — | 4 | 92 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kent State | W 71-0 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ NC State | W 51-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 89 | 14 | 14.80 | 0 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Tennessee
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | USC | 236 | 69.3 | 12 | 236 |
| 2021 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | -236 |
| 2022 Postseason | Tennessee | 667 | 73.6 | 19.4 | 667 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 667 | 73.6 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 217 | 74.9 | 16.7 | -450 |
| 2024 Postseason | Tennessee | 472 | 68.3 | 20 | 255 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tennessee | 472 | 68.3 | 20 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140
Primary metric
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Alabama
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
89
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Tennessee
667 primary output · 73.6 efficiency · 19.4 usage
61.5
#2
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
61.5
667 primary · 73.6 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Tennessee
55.3
472 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 20 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9944
Mater Dei · Santa Ana, CA
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,592
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.