Usage Score
24.7
Player Dossier
2018-2023Ohio State
Sam Wiglusz
WR • 6'0" • 183 lbs • Brecksville, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Sam Wiglusz reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.3
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ohio
1819202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ohio State • Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Wiglusz, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ohio. Sam Wiglusz reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ohio paired 883 primary output with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Ohio.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Ohio
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
63.1
Efficiency
69.3
Usage
24.7
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 27. Florida Atlantic: 59. Penn State: 23. Iowa State: 26. Unknown: 73. Kent State: 115. Akron: 144. Western Michigan: 76. Northern Illinois: 69. Buffalo: 131. Miami (OH): 4. Ball State: 80. Bowling Green: 20. Toledo: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 4 by 45. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 78.7. Penn State: 4 by 38.3. Iowa State: 4 by 43.3. Unknown: 10 by 48.7. Kent State: 6 by 100. Akron: 7 by 100. Western Michigan: 8 by 63.3. Northern Illinois: 6 by 76.7. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 4 by 6.7. Ball State: 6 by 88.9. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins67.8 · n=9 · +17.8 vs Losses
Losses50 · n=4 · -17.8 vs Wins
First Half66.7 · n=7 · +7.3 vs Second Half
Second Half59.4 · n=7 · -7.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | @ Wyoming | W 30-27 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Toledo | L 7-17 | — | 3 | 36 | 16.5 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Bowling Green | W 38-14 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Ball State | W 32-18 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Wed 11/9 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-21 | — | 4 | 4 | -0.6 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| Tue 11/1 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 131 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 2 | 49 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 24-17 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | W 33-14 | — | 8 | 76 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Akron100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-34 | — | 7 | 144 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards | L 24-31 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 10 | 73 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Iowa State | L 10-43 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Penn State | L 10-46 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Florida Atlantic2+ TD | W 41-38 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 2 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Ohio
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 11 | 73.3 | 4.8 | 11 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | -11 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 14 | 46.7 | 5.6 | 14 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ohio | 883 | 69.3 | 24.7 | 869 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio | 883 | 69.3 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ohio | 664 | 77.3 | 25.9 | -219 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ohio | 664 | 77.3 | 25.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Ohio
883 primary output · 69.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
64.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · Ohio
64.1
883 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Ohio
59.1
664 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 25.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,572
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.