Usage Score
30.7
Player Dossier
2021-2021Western Kentucky
Jarreth Sterns
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jarreth Sterns reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
2121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Western Kentucky
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarreth Sterns, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky. Jarreth Sterns reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Western Kentucky paired 1,902 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
135.9
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
30.7
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 184. Unknown: 107. Army: 171. Indiana: 82. Michigan State: 186. UTSA: 195. Old Dominion: 221. Florida International: 115. Charlotte: 89. Middle Tennessee: 110. Rice: 92. Florida Atlantic: 143. Marshall: 28. UTSA: 179
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 13 by 94.4. Unknown: 7 by 100. Army: 9 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 78.1. Michigan State: 17 by 72.9. UTSA: 16 by 81.3. Old Dominion: 13 by 100. Florida International: 14 by 54.8. Charlotte: 10 by 59.3. Middle Tennessee: 11 by 66.7. Rice: 7 by 87.6. Florida Atlantic: 12 by 79.4. Marshall: 4 by 46.7. UTSA: 10 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins122.8 · n=8 · -39.8 vs Losses
Losses162.6 · n=5 · +39.8 vs Wins
First Half163.7 · n=7 · +55.7 vs Second Half
Second Half108 · n=7 · -55.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ App State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-38 | — | 13 | 184 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 3 | 43 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-49 | — | 10 | 179 | 16.5 | 17.90 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Marshall | W 53-21 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-17 | — | 12 | 143 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Rice | W 42-21 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-21 | — | 11 | 110 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs CharlotteHigh volume | W 45-13 | — | 10 | 89 | 8.2 | 8.90 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Florida International100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-19 | — | 14 | 115 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Old Dominion100 receiving yards · High volume | W 43-20 | — | 13 | 221 | 16.3 | 17 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-52 | — | 16 | 195 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 2 | 55 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-48 | — | 17 | 186 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Indiana | L 31-33 | — | 7 | 82 | 9.9 | 11.70 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Army100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-38 | — | 9 | 171 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 72 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Kentucky
2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 1,902 | 80.1 | 30.7 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 1,902 | 80.1 | 30.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 72.2 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
138
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 65.7 efficiency score.
#3
Old Dominion
221
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
221 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
62
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 51.7 efficiency score.
#5
App State
184
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
1,902 primary output · 80.1 efficiency · 30.7 usage
71
#2
2021 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
71
1,902 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 30.7 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7953
Waxahachie · Waxahachie, TX
- Committed To
- Houston Christian
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,902
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.