Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTEP
Blake Thompson
DT • 6'0" • 289 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Blake Thompson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.1
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
25.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · UTEP
1819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Thompson, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · UTEP. Blake Thompson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
14.1
Usage
5.9
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. New Mexico State: 1. Boise State: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. UTSA: 0. North Texas: 1. Rice: 1. UAB: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 1 by 14.2. Boise State: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 2 by 18.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 2 by 18.3. Rice: 1 by 14.2. UAB: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=4 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=4 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | @ UAB | L 25-42 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Rice | W 38-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ North Texas | L 17-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/7 | vs UTSA | L 23-44 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 19-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Southern Miss | W 26-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Boise State | L 13-54 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/29 | @ New Mexico State | W 30-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 5.6 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 14.1 | 5.9 | 6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 1.5 | 14.1 | 3 | -4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.9 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.6 takeover score.
#4
Florida International
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 24.8 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 1 usage
35.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
25.1
6 primary · 14.1 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
8.4
1.5 primary · 14.1 efficiency · 3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
40
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.