Usage Score
16
Player Dossier
2019-2023North Texas
WR • 5'9" • 190 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Roderic Burns reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16
Efficiency
59.7
Consistency
37.5
Season Value
44.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Roderic Burns, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · North Texas. Roderic Burns reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
North Texas paired 802 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
59.7
Usage
16
Consistency
37.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 26. Florida International: 54. Louisiana Tech: 134. Unknown: 1. Navy: 39. Temple: 21. Tulane: 54. Memphis: 102. SMU: 1. Tulsa: 18. UAB: 17
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 4 by 43.3. Florida International: 4 by 90. Louisiana Tech: 11 by 81.2. Unknown: 1 by 6.7. Navy: 5 by 52. Temple: 2 by 70. Tulane: 4 by 90. Memphis: 5 by 100. SMU: 1 by 6.7. Tulsa: 2 by 60. UAB: 2 by 56.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UAB | W 45-42 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulsa | W 35-28 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ SMU | L 21-45 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 42-45 | — | 5 | 102 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 3 | 41 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Tulane | L 28-35 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Temple | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Navy | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-37 | — | 11 | 134 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Florida International | L 39-46 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs California | L 21-58 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 19 | 63.3 | 5.6 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | North Texas | 161 | 59.1 | 8.7 | 142 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Texas | 161 | 59.1 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | North Texas | 802 | 77.2 | 28.4 | 641 |
| 2021 Regular Season | North Texas | 802 | 77.2 | 28.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | North Texas | 676 | 77.1 | 17.4 | -126 |
| 2022 Regular Season | North Texas | 676 | 77.1 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 467 | 59.7 | 16 | -209 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
114
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 81.2 efficiency score.
#4
Florida International
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
141
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · North Texas
802 primary output · 77.2 efficiency · 28.4 usage
65.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · North Texas
65.8
802 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 28.4 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · North Texas
61.7
676 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 17.4 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,125
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Roderic Burns quick answers