Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022Bowling Green
Caleb Biggers
CB • 5'11" • 195 lbs • Prince Frederick, MD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Caleb Biggers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Efficiency
19
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
17.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Bowling Green • Boise State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Caleb Biggers, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Caleb Biggers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with 21.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, Boise State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Boise State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
19
Usage
8.6
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon State: 1. New Mexico: 2. Unknown: 0. UTEP: 0. San Diego State: 2. Fresno State: 0. Air Force: 0. Colorado State: 0. BYU: 1. Nevada: 0. Wyoming: 3. Utah State: 0. Fresno State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon State: 3 by 22.5. New Mexico: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. UTEP: 6 by 25. San Diego State: 1 by 24.2. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 2 by 8.3. Colorado State: 1 by 4.2. BYU: 4 by 26.7. Nevada: 1 by 4.2. Wyoming: 6 by 55. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Fresno State: 1 by 24.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=8 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=4 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
55 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs Fresno State | L 16-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Utah State | W 42-23 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ WyomingSplash game | W 20-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Nevada | W 41-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BYU | L 28-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Colorado State | W 49-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Air Force | W 19-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Fresno State | W 40-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs San Diego State | W 35-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ UTEP | L 10-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ New MexicoSplash game | W 31-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Oregon State | L 17-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Boise State
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 21.7 | 4.4 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 5 | 21.3 | 5.3 | 5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 3 | 27.7 | 4.9 | -2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Boise State | 5.5 | 19.7 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boise State | 11 | 19 | 8.6 | 5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#2
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#3
Akron
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#4
Akron
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#5
Fresno State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · 21.7 efficiency · 4.4 usage
42
#2
2022 Regular Season · Boise State
17.5
11 primary · 19 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Boise State
17
5.5 primary · 19.7 efficiency · 2.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7798
Calvert Hall College · Prince Frederick, MD
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
158
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.