Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2019-2022Pittsburgh
Habakkuk Baldonado
DL • 6'5" • 260 lbs • Rome, Italy
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Habakkuk Baldonado shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
27.2
Consistency
52.2
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
191920212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Habakkuk Baldonado, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Habakkuk Baldonado shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 27.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
27.2
Usage
9.3
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Tennessee: 4. Western Michigan: 3.5. Unknown: 1. Georgia Tech: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 2.5. Clemson: 2. Miami: 2.5. Duke: 0. North Carolina: 3. Virginia: 0. Syracuse: 0. Wake Forest: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 3 by 52.5. Western Michigan: 7 by 64.2. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Georgia Tech: 3 by 17.5. Virginia Tech: 3 by 37.5. Clemson: 3 by 32.5. Miami: 2 by 33.3. Duke: 2 by 8.3. North Carolina: 4 by 46.7. Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Wake Forest: 7 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=10 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=3 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.6 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=7 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Michigan State | L 21-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/5 | @ Wake Forest | W 45-21 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Syracuse | W 31-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Virginia | W 48-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/12 | vs North Carolina | W 30-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Duke | W 54-29 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Miami | L 34-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Clemson | W 27-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Georgia Tech | W 52-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Western MichiganSplash game | L 41-44 | 7 | 6 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Tennessee2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 9.5 | 20 | 5.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 9.5 | 20 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | 6.3 | 1.3 | -9.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 21 | 27.2 | 9.3 | 21 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 21 | 27.2 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 10 | 22.2 | 5.9 | -11 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#2
Tennessee
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.3 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#4
UCF
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#5
Virginia
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1.3 usage
35.9
#2
2021 Postseason · Pittsburgh
35
21 primary · 27.2 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
35
21 primary · 27.2 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8573
Clearwater Academy International · Italy
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.