Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2018-2022North Carolina
Antoine Green
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Rockledge, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Antoine Green reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.4
Consistency
52.1
Season Value
54.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · North Carolina
1819192020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antoine Green, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · North Carolina. Antoine Green reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
North Carolina paired 798 primary output with 88.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · North Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.1
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
13.5
Consistency
52.1
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 73. Virginia Tech: 20. Georgia State: 117. Virginia: 11. Georgia Tech: 50. Duke: 7. Florida State: 7. Miami: 41. Notre Dame: 83. Wake Forest: 83. Pittsburgh: 108. Unknown: 1. NC State: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 4 by 100. Virginia Tech: 2 by 66.7. Georgia State: 3 by 100. Virginia: 1 by 73.3. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. Duke: 1 by 46.7. Florida State: 1 by 46.7. Miami: 1 by 100. Notre Dame: 5 by 100. Wake Forest: 6 by 92.2. Pittsburgh: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 6.7. NC State: 1 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins51.8 · n=5 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses50.3 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half40.7 · n=7 · -13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half54.5 · n=6 · +13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia State
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | @ South Carolina | L 21-38 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ NC State | L 30-34 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri 11/12 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 23-30 | — | 3 | 108 | 36 | 36 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Wake Forest | W 58-55 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Notre Dame | L 34-44 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Miami | W 45-42 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Florida State | L 25-35 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Duke | W 38-7 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Georgia Tech | L 22-45 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Virginia | W 59-39 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Georgia State100 receiving yards | W 59-17 | — | 3 | 117 | 39 | 39 | 1 | 57 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Virginia Tech | L 10-17 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Carolina
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | North Carolina | 45 | 62.2 | 4.9 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | North Carolina | 217 | 90.2 | 8.2 | 172 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Carolina | 217 | 90.2 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | North Carolina | 38 | 52.2 | 7.8 | -179 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Carolina | 38 | 52.2 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | North Carolina | 612 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 574 |
| 2021 Regular Season | North Carolina | 612 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | North Carolina | 798 | 88.7 | 17.5 | 186 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia State
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · North Carolina
798 primary output · 88.7 efficiency · 17.5 usage
65.3
#2
2021 Postseason · North Carolina
54.7
612 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 13.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · North Carolina
54.7
612 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8935
Rockledge · Rockledge, FL
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,710
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.