Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2018-2020Texas A&M
TE • 6'5" • 265 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Glenn Beal reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
55.9
Season Value
45.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Glenn Beal, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Glenn Beal reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 21 primary output with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Louisiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
5.3
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
5.2
Consistency
55.9
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 10. Unknown: 9. Auburn: 0. UTSA: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 2 by 33.3. Unknown: 1 by 60. Auburn: 1 by 0. UTSA: 1 by 13.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
60 vs Unknown
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2018-2020
Opening stop
Louisiana
2020
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 21 | 26.7 | 5.2 | 21 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -21 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
9
Primary metric
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
Texas State
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
21 primary output · 26.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
45.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Texas A&M
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8723
John Curtis · New Orleans, LA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
21
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Glenn Beal quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit