Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2018-2023Purdue
Jack Sullivan
DL • 6'5" • 275 lbs • Plainfield, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jack Sullivan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
21
Consistency
50
Season Value
29.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue
181920212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Purdue • USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jack Sullivan, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue. Jack Sullivan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Purdue
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
21
Usage
8.9
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Penn State: 0. Unknown: 2. Syracuse: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Minnesota: 1.5. Maryland: 0. Nebraska: 2. Wisconsin: 2. Iowa: 3. Illinois: 0. Northwestern: 2. Indiana: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Syracuse: 4 by 16.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 8.3. Minnesota: 2 by 23.3. Maryland: 3 by 12.5. Nebraska: 4 by 36.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 24.2. Iowa: 3 by 42.5. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Northwestern: 3 by 32.5. Indiana: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=7 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs LSU | L 7-63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | W 30-16 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Northwestern | W 17-9 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Illinois | W 31-24 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs IowaSplash game | L 3-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Wisconsin | L 24-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Nebraska | W 43-37 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Maryland | W 31-29 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Minnesota | W 20-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 28-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Syracuse | L 29-32 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Penn State | L 31-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
USC
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 4.2 | 1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 5 | 11.6 | 1.1 | 5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 3 | 20 | 7.5 | -2 |
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 9 | 16.9 | 6.8 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 9 | 16.9 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Purdue | 13.5 | 21 | 8.9 | 4.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 13.5 | 21 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 3 | 15.8 | 10.5 | -10.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 3 | 15.8 | 10.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#2
Tennessee
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#3
Iowa
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 1 usage
35.1
#2
2022 Postseason · Purdue
29.9
13.5 primary · 21 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Purdue
29.9
13.5 primary · 21 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8444
Plainfield East · Plainfield, IL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.