Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Tulsa
Anthony Goodlow
DE • 6'5" • 283 lbs • Del City, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Anthony Goodlow shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.2
Consistency
34.5
Season Value
21.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
1920202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Goodlow, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa. Anthony Goodlow shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
21.2
Usage
7.9
Consistency
34.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 2. Arizona State: 2. South Alabama: 0. Iowa State: 0.5. Kansas State: 0. Kansas: 1.5. West Virginia: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Oklahoma: 2. UCF: 0.5. Houston: 0. BYU: 0.5. Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 28.3. Arizona State: 3 by 32.5. South Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Iowa State: 3 by 17.5. Kansas State: 3 by 12.5. Kansas: 4 by 31.7. West Virginia: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 6 by 25. Oklahoma: 3 by 32.5. UCF: 3 by 17.5. Houston: 3 by 12.5. BYU: 1 by 9.2. Texas: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=9 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=4 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 31-23 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Texas | L 21-49 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs BYU | W 40-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Houston | W 43-30 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ UCF | L 3-45 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Oklahoma | W 27-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-13 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ West Virginia | W 48-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Kansas | W 39-32 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Kansas State | W 29-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Iowa State | L 27-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs South Alabama | L 7-33 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Arizona State | W 27-15 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2019-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma State
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 6.3 | 1 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Tulsa | 10.5 | 26.5 | 7.9 | 10.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 10.5 | 26.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tulsa | 13 | 20.6 | 8.5 | 2.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulsa | 13 | 20.6 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 12 | 25.3 | 9.5 | -1 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 10 | 21.2 | 7.9 | -2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 10 | 21.2 | 7.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.5 takeover score.
#2
SMU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#3
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#5
UCF
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1 usage
35.7
#2
2020 Postseason · Tulsa
27
10.5 primary · 26.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Tulsa
27
10.5 primary · 26.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8215
Del City · Oklahoma City, OK
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
155
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.