Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2018-2024Tulsa
Justin Wright
LB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Abilene, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Wright shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
48.6
Consistency
37.6
Season Value
29.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
181920202121222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Wright, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Justin Wright shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 48.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
48.6
Usage
13.5
Consistency
37.6
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Unknown: 4. Ole Miss: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Navy: 1. Temple: 2. SMU: 2. Tulane: 0.5. Memphis: 4.5. South Florida: 0. Houston: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 13 by 60. Northern Illinois: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 5 by 60.8. Ole Miss: 7 by 39.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 25. Navy: 13 by 60. Temple: 4 by 36.7. SMU: 7 by 49.2. Tulane: 9 by 42.5. Memphis: 13 by 95. South Florida: 10 by 41.7. Houston: 7 by 44.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=4 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · n=6 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
95 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Houston | W 37-30 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs South Florida10+ tackles | W 48-42 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Memphis10+ tackles · Splash game | L 10-26 | 13 | 9 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane | L 13-27 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs SMUSplash game | L 34-45 | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/21 | @ TempleSplash game | W 27-16 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy10+ tackles | L 21-53 | 13 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Cincinnati | L 21-31 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ole Miss | L 27-35 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-35 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wyoming10+ tackles | L 37-40 | 13 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma State
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202020212021202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2 | 9.9 | 4.6 | 2 |
| 2020 Postseason | Tulsa | 12.5 | 43.1 | 12.9 | 10.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 12.5 | 43.1 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tulsa | 11 | 36.9 | 9.9 | -1.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 36.9 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 17.5 | 48.6 | 13.5 | 6.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 8.3 | 1.5 | -17.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1 | 20.2 | 4.7 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 74.3 takeover score.
#2
South Florida
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 72.4 takeover score.
#3
Navy
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#4
UCF
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.5 usage
36.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
29.2
17.5 primary · 48.6 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
8
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7953
Cooper · Abilene, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
273
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.