Usage Score
24.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Hawai'i
Cedric Byrd II
WR • 5'9" • 175 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Cedric Byrd II reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Hawai'i
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Hawai'i
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cedric Byrd II, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Hawai'i. Cedric Byrd II reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Hawai'i paired 1,097 primary output with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Hawai'i
Games
15
Receiving Yards / G
73.1
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
24.5
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 29. Arizona: 224. Oregon State: 61. Washington: 72. Unknown: 54. Nevada: 87. Boise State: 74. Air Force: 59. New Mexico: 58. Fresno State: 97. San José State: 52. UNLV: 60. San Diego State: 29. Army: 122. Boise State: 19
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 3 by 64.4. Arizona: 14 by 100. Oregon State: 7 by 58.1. Washington: 6 by 80. Unknown: 6 by 60. Nevada: 7 by 82.9. Boise State: 6 by 82.2. Air Force: 7 by 56.2. New Mexico: 6 by 64.4. Fresno State: 8 by 80.8. San José State: 7 by 49.5. UNLV: 5 by 80. San Diego State: 4 by 48.3. Army: 8 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 31.7
Split Comparison
Wins80.2 · n=9 · +16.0 vs Losses
Losses64.2 · n=5 · -16.0 vs Wins
First Half82.5 · n=8 · +20.1 vs Second Half
Second Half62.4 · n=7 · -20.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/25 | @ BYU | W 38-34 | — | 3 | 29 | 7.8 | 9.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Boise State | L 10-31 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Army100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-31 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 45 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs San Diego State | W 14-11 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UNLV | W 21-7 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs San José State | W 42-40 | — | 7 | 52 | 6.8 | 7.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs Fresno StateHigh volume | L 38-41 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ New Mexico | W 45-31 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Air Force | L 26-56 | — | 7 | 59 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Boise State | L 37-59 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Nevada2+ TD | W 54-3 | — | 7 | 87 | 14.5 | 12.40 | 3 | 36 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Washington | L 20-52 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Oregon State | W 31-28 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 8/25 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-38 | — | 14 | 224 | 15.1 | 16 | 4 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Hawai'i
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Hawai'i | 970 | 73.6 | 24.4 | 970 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 970 | 73.6 | 24.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Hawai'i | 1,097 | 69.2 | 24.5 | 127 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 1,097 | 69.2 | 24.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
181
Primary metric
181 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
224
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
224 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Army
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Army
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Hawai'i
1,097 primary output · 69.2 efficiency · 24.5 usage
62.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Hawai'i
62.7
1,097 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 24.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Hawai'i
59.3
970 primary · 73.6 efficiency · 24.4 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.951
Northwood · Nappanee, IN
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,067
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.