Usage Score
15.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Eastern Michigan
WR • 6'0" • 194 lbs • Oakland, CA, USA
Arthur Jackson III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.2
Efficiency
82.1
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Arthur Jackson III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan. Arthur Jackson III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Eastern Michigan paired 732 primary output with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
61
Efficiency
82.1
Usage
15.2
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 53. Coastal Carolina: 8. Kentucky: 71. Illinois: 80. Unknown: 48. Central Michigan: 30. Ball State: 48. Western Michigan: 98. Toledo: 73. Akron: 16. Northern Illinois: 78. Kent State: 129
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 7 by 50.5. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 26.7. Kentucky: 5 by 94.7. Illinois: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 66.7. Ball State: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 7 by 93.3. Toledo: 4 by 100. Akron: 2 by 53.3. Northern Illinois: 5 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Pittsburgh | L 30-34 | — | 7 | 53 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 1 | 11 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards | L 26-34 | — | 4 | 129 | 32.3 | 32.30 | 0 | 54 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 45-17 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 2 | 36 |
| Tue 11/12 | @ Akron | W 42-14 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Toledo | L 34-37 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Western Michigan | W 34-27 | — | 7 | 98 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Ball State | L 23-29 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Central Michigan | L 16-42 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Illinois2+ TD | W 34-31 | — | 3 | 80 | 26.7 | 26.70 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kentucky | L 17-38 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Coastal Carolina | W 30-23 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Eastern Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 592 | 66.7 | 19.2 | 592 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 592 | 66.7 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 732 | 82.1 | 15.2 | 140 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 732 | 82.1 | 15.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Primary metric
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
732 primary output · 82.1 efficiency · 15.2 usage
66.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
66.3
732 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 15.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
60.2
592 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 19.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,324
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Arthur Jackson III quick answers