Usage Score
21.1
Player Dossier
2018-2022Eastern Michigan
Hassan Beydoun
WR • 5'8" • 174 lbs • Dearborn, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Hassan Beydoun reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60.4
Consistency
63.4
Season Value
48.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
1819192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hassan Beydoun, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Hassan Beydoun reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 508 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
36.5
Efficiency
60.4
Usage
21.1
Consistency
63.4
Best Game by takeover score
San José State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 22. Unknown: 48. Louisiana: 44. Arizona State: 6. Buffalo: 50. Massachusetts: 7. Western Michigan: 57. Northern Illinois: 2. Ball State: 85. Toledo: 35. Akron: 19. Kent State: 70. Central Michigan: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 2 by 73.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. Louisiana: 5 by 58.7. Arizona State: 1 by 40. Buffalo: 4 by 83.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 4.4. Ball State: 10 by 56.7. Toledo: 5 by 46.7. Akron: 3 by 42.2. Kent State: 7 by 66.7. Central Michigan: 3 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins37 · n=8 · +4.3 vs Losses
Losses32.8 · n=4 · -4.3 vs Wins
First Half33.4 · n=7 · -6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half40.2 · n=6 · +6.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/20 | @ San José State | W 41-27 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Central Michigan | W 38-19 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Kent State | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 17 |
| Wed 11/9 | @ Akron | W 34-28 | — | 3 | 19 | 5.5 | 6.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Toledo | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 35 | 4.5 | 7 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Ball StateHigh volume | W 20-16 | — | 10 | 85 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Northern Illinois | L 10-39 | — | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Western Michigan | W 45-23 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Massachusetts | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Buffalo | L 31-50 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Arizona State | W 30-21 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Louisiana | L 21-49 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 345 | 70.7 | 12.3 | 345 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 345 | 70.7 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 508 | 82.2 | 36.9 | 163 |
| 2021 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 1,015 | 64.5 | 30.8 | 507 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 1,015 | 64.5 | 30.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 475 | 60.4 | 21.1 | -540 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 475 | 60.4 | 21.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197
Primary metric
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
167
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
167 receiving yards with a 79.5 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 83.7 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 83 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
508 primary output · 82.2 efficiency · 36.9 usage
64.5
#2
2021 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
63.6
1,015 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 30.8 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
63.6
1,015 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 30.8 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,343
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.