Usage Score
30.5
Player Dossier
2019-2023Eastern Michigan
Tanner Knue
WR • 5'11" • 178 lbs • Mason, OH, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Tanner Knue reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57
Consistency
45.6
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
19202121222223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tanner Knue, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Eastern Michigan. Tanner Knue reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Eastern Michigan paired 631 primary output with 78.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
43.5
Efficiency
57
Usage
30.5
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 73. Minnesota: 21. Massachusetts: 25. Central Michigan: 68. Ball State: 23. Kent State: 85. Northern Illinois: 10. Western Michigan: 66. Toledo: 22. Akron: 79. Buffalo: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 8 by 60.8. Minnesota: 4 by 35. Massachusetts: 3 by 55.6. Central Michigan: 7 by 64.8. Ball State: 3 by 51.1. Kent State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 88. Toledo: 3 by 48.9. Akron: 8 by 65.8. Buffalo: 2 by 23.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins43.8 · Games = 5 · +6.4 vs Losses
Losses37.4 · Games = 5 · -6.4 vs Wins
First Half49.2 · Games = 6 · +12.4 vs Second Half
Second Half36.8 · Games = 5 · -12.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Buffalo | W 24-11 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Wed 11/15 | vs AkronHigh volume | W 30-27 | — | 8 | 79 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 34 |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Toledo | L 23-49 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Western Michigan | L 21-45 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northern Illinois | L 13-20 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Kent State | W 28-14 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Ball State | W 24-10 | — | 3 | 23 | 6.3 | 7.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Central Michigan | L 23-26 | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Massachusetts | W 19-17 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Minnesota | L 6-25 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Fri 9/1 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 8 | 73 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 1 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 413 | 85.7 | 22.4 | 413 |
| 2021 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 342 | 71 | 23.8 | -71 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 342 | 71 | 23.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 631 | 78.8 | 20.3 | 289 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 631 | 78.8 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 479 | 57 | 30.5 | -152 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 77 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
631 primary output · 78.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage
65.8
#2
2022 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
65.8
631 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
60.3
413 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 22.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,865
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.