Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2018-2023Miami (OH)
Cecil Singleton Jr.
DB • 6'2" • 210 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cecil Singleton Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.1
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
30.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
1819192021212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Miami (OH) • Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Jacksonville State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cecil Singleton Jr., DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Cecil Singleton Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 14 primary output with 31.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami (OH), Louisiana Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
31.1
Usage
10.3
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 1. Unknown: 1. Clemson: 0. South Alabama: 0. UTEP: 1. North Texas: 1. Rice: 2. Florida International: 1. Middle Tennessee: 3. UTSA: 2. Charlotte: 2. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 4 by 26.7. Clemson: 4 by 16.7. South Alabama: 5 by 20.8. UTEP: 6 by 35. North Texas: 7 by 39.2. Rice: 6 by 45. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 63.3. UTSA: 3 by 32.5. Charlotte: 5 by 40.8. UAB: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=2 · +1 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=9 · -1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=6 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
63.3 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UAB | L 27-37 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Charlotte | L 21-26 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UTSA | L 7-51 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 40-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Florida International | L 34-42 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Rice | L 41-42 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ North Texas | L 27-47 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs UTEP | W 41-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Alabama | L 14-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Clemson | L 20-48 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Missouri | L 24-52 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Louisiana Tech
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202021202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 1 | 10 | 0 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 2 | 16.1 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 2 | 16.1 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 2 | 17.8 | 4 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 4 | 19.8 | 4.1 | 2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 4 | 19.8 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 14 | 31.1 | 10.3 | 10 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 3 | 28.2 | 5.9 | -11 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Jacksonville State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Army
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#4
Akron
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#5
Cincinnati
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
14 primary output · 31.1 efficiency · 10.3 usage
30.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
27.8
1 primary · 10 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
10.9
3 primary · 28.2 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7998
Walnut Hills · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
206
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.