Usage / Role
50%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTSA
QB • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Cordale Grundy is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
50%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
25
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
24
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
39
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Cordale Grundy built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a quarterback from Tulsa, OK wearing No. 14, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Cordale Grundy's career was his passing role: 993 passing...
Read the storyCordale Grundy, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. Cordale Grundy is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 1,156 | 989 | 167 | 6 | 69.1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | 20.6 |
Related Context
Cordale Grundy played QB for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cordale Grundy recorded 993 passing yards, 164 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTSA paired 1,156 primary output with 50.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 50.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
128.4
Efficiency
50.6
Usage
26.4
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 177. Baylor: 127. Kansas State: 138. Texas State: 158. UTEP: 231. Rice: 69. Louisiana Tech: 251. Southern Miss: 0. UAB: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 45 by 45.9. Baylor: 40 by 45.5. Kansas State: 32 by 58.3. Texas State: 43 by 55.8. UTEP: 44 by 62.6. Rice: 25 by 50. Louisiana Tech: 49 by 57.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 33.3. UAB: 5 by 46.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
62.6 vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | L 3-52 | 1 | 4 | -1 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 46.3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Southern Miss | L 17-27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisiana TechDual-threat | L 3-31 | 17 | 38 | 191 | 44.7 | 0 | 1 | 57.7 | 11 | 60 | 5.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Rice | W 20-3 | 6 | 18 | 33 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP3+ TD | W 30-21 | 20 | 35 | 187 | 57.1 | 2 | 0 | 62.6 | 9 | 44 | 4.90 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas State | W 25-21 | 19 | 35 | 127 | 54.3 | 1 | 0 | 55.8 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas State | L 17-41 | 14 | 23 | 108 | 60.9 | 1 | 0 | 58.3 | 9 | 30 | 3.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Baylor | L 20-37 | 18 | 33 | 157 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | 45.5 | 7 | -30 | -4.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Arizona State | L 7-49 | 16 | 33 | 187 | 48.5 | 0 | 1 | 45.9 | 12 | -10 | -0.80 | 0 | 12 |
Player Story
Cordale Grundy built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a quarterback from Tulsa, OK wearing No. 14, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Cordale Grundy's career was his passing role: 993 passing yards, 5 touchdown passes, 225 attempts, and 164 rushing yards across 11 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2018 with UTSA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 164 rushing yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 11 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTSA.
The arc is straightforward: Cordale Grundy moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,156 | 50.6 | 26.4 | 1,156 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 16.7 | 7.1 | -1,155 |
#1 Featured game
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 7 · L 3-31 · Conference game
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
251
Total Offense
85.9 takeover
251 total offense with 57.7 efficiency.
#2
vs UTEP
Week 5 · W 30-21 · Conference game
231
Total Offense
79.3 takeover
Win with 231 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency.
231 total offense with 62.6 efficiency.
#3
@ Arizona State
Week 1 · L 7-49
177
Total Offense
64.2 takeover
Loss with 177 yards of offense and 45.9 efficiency.
177 total offense with 45.9 efficiency.
#4
@ Kansas State
Week 3 · L 17-41
138
Total Offense
54.9 takeover
Loss with 138 yards of offense and 58.3 efficiency.
138 total offense with 58.3 efficiency.
#5
vs Texas State
Week 4 · W 25-21
158
Total Offense
54 takeover
Win with 158 yards of offense and 55.8 efficiency.
158 total offense with 55.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
1,156 primary output · 50.6 efficiency · 26.4 usage
69.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
20.6
1 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ TD games
1
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.